Free Term Papers on The Hell Of 1984

OPPapers.com Essay Index >> American History >> The Hell Of 1984

We have many free term papers and essays on The Hell Of 1984. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.

Essays from FratFiles.com
  1. The Hell Of 1984

    the hell of 1984. The Hell of Nineteen Eighty-Four. ). Did Orwell realise
    quite what he had done in Nineteen Eighty-Four? His post ...

  2. Horror Movie Directors

    ... He also made the television movies A Stranger in our House (1978), Invitation
    to Hell (1984), Chiller (1985), and Night Visions (1990). ...

  3. Who The Hell Is Connie Chung?

    Who The Hell Is Connie Chung? JMC 101, Section 101 Who the Hell is Connie Chung? ...
    (Moritz 108) In 1984, Chung, eager to return to reporting national politics ...

  4. Who The Hell Is Connie Chung?

    Who The Hell Is Connie Chung? JMC 101, Section 101 Who the Hell is Connie Chung? ...
    (Moritz 108) In 1984, Chung, eager to return to reporting national politics ...

  5. Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984

    ... as the perfect society with a perfect government, or two, as a communistic hell
    where free will no longer exists and no one is happy. The novel 1984 by George ...

View More Papers...

The Hell Of 1984

Submitted by oppapers on May 2, 2003

Category: American History
Words: 7773 | Pages: 32
Views: 489
Popularity Rank: 18,302
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)

The Hell of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
). Did Orwell realise quite what he had done in Nineteen Eighty-Four? His post-publication glosses on its meaning reveal either blankness or bad faith even about its contemporary political implications. He insisted, for example, that his 'recent novel [was] NOT intended as an attack on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of which I am a supporter)'.(1) He may well not have intended it but that is what it can reasonably be taken to be. Warburg saw this immediately he had read the manuscript, and predicted that Nineteen Eighty-Four '[was] worth a cool million votes to the Conservative Party';(2) the literary editor of the Evening Standard 'sarcastically prescribed it as "required reading" for Labour Party M.P.s',(3) and, in the US, the Washington branch of the John Birch Society 'adopted "1984" as the last four digits of its telephone number'.(4) Moreover, Churchill had made the 'inseparably interwoven' relation between socialism and totalitarianism a plank in his 1945 election campaign(5) (and was not the protagonist of Nineteen Eighty-Four called Winston?). If, ten years earlier, an Orwell had written a futuristic fantasy in which Big Brother had had Hitler's features rather than Stalin's, would not the Left, whatever the writer's proclaimed political sympathies, have welcomed it as showing how capitalism, by its very nature, led to totalitarian fascism?
With Nineteen Eighty-Four, it is particularly necessary to trust the tale and not the teller, but even this has its pitfalls. Interpretations of the novel already exist which blatantly ignore the intentions of the author by reinterpreting its manifest content without any obvious justification. But all existing interpretations of Nineteen Eighty-Four are unsatisfactory in one regard or another. For many years Nineteen Eighty-Four 'served as a sort of an ideological super-weapon in the Cold War',(6) was used along with Animal Farm as propaganda in the Western...

You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!