OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> Groups In Organizations
We have many free term papers and essays on Groups In Organizations. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
... This means that sociology places individuals in a social context as members of social
groups, organizations and institutions (like the place where they work or ...
groups in organizations. Group behaviour in organisations. group decision
making strategies and pitfalls. As a rule, decision-making ...
... who describes a religion that is fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic; and other
are the Black Separatist groups, who are organizations whose ideologies ...
... PriceWaterhouse Coopers, states that there are several organizations within PwC
that are broken down by local offices, industry specific groups, national groups ...
... Other radical groups, such as the militant abortion foes, do participate in bombings
of clinics and the like, but the doomsday organizations are more willing ...
Submitted by esej on December 15, 2007
Category: Business
Words: 1523 | Pages: 7
Views: 121
Popularity Rank: 81,334
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Group behaviour in organisations.
group decision making strategies and pitfalls.
As a rule, decision-making processes are at management level, and decisions are fed downwards through the organisation’s structure. Where group decisions are made, these may be democratic, autocratic or by consensus.
Autocratic decision making is the simplest and most straightforward strategy. It is the process by which the group leader makes the decision alone, using only the information that the leader possesses. The major advantage is that it is fast. However, because the decision is made based only on what s/he knows, the quality of the decision may suffer. An example could be the selection of a new computer package for a company. A variation on the strict autocratic decision making approach occurs when the leader solicits information from group members to assist in reaching a decision, but still holds the final say. This is sometimes referred to as consultative decision making.
Democratic decision making is a different strategy in which all group members are allowed to discuss the decision and then vote on a particular course of action. Typically, the outcome is based on a majority rule. One advantage of this approach is that decisions are made using the pooled knowledge and experience of group members. Moreover, a greater number of alternatives may be considered. Also, because group members have a role in the process, they are more likely to follow the chosen course.
The most obvious drawback to democratic decision making is that it is time-consuming. Because it encourages conflict, it can also be inefficient. Finally, although it can result in a satisfied majority, there may be a disgruntled minority who resists its implementation.
A strategy that overcomes some of the weaknesses of democratic decision making is to make decisions based on consensus. In this process, all group...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!