Preview

Gandhi, King and Mandela: What Made Non-Violence Work?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gandhi, King and Mandela: What Made Non-Violence Work?
Gandhi, King, and Mandela: What Made Non-Violence Work? All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela. Mohandas Gandhi’s methods not only led to India’s independence from Britain but also had victories over racial discrimination in South Africa. Gandhi saw, upon his return to India from South Africa, that Britain had run India’s people into poverty and subordination. Indians were not allowed to manufacture or own their own salt. This affected the poor population most because of how often they used salt. Gandhi began by writing to the English Governor in India describing his plan to “convert the British people through nonviolence and [to] make them see the wrong they have done to India” (Document 1). He felt that the “British rule [was] a curse”. Even though Gandhi spent a total of 2.338 days in prison, he “did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Doc. 7). People followed Gandhi in his protests and many followed him into jail feeling “firm in [their] resolution of passing [their] terms in jail in perfect happiness and peace” (Doc. 7). While he was in jail, Mme. Naidu, an Indian poetess, filled in his position in leading protests. She encouraged the protesters by reiterating that “[they] must not use any violence… [they would] be beaten but [they] must not resist…not even raise a hand to ward off blows” (Doc. 4). The author felt that “the western mind finds it difficult to grasp the idea of nonresistance”, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferdinand Magellan was a Portuguese explorer who started his voyage in Spain and was the first explorer to circumnavigate, meaning to travel all the around the world. He was killed on April 27, 1521 by the natives on the island of Cebu in the Philippines while many of his own men stayed on the boat despite knowing their captain was in trouble. The question being asked was whether or not this captain was worth defending. This question could be answered either way but in this essay we are going to argue that Magellan was not worth defending. Ferdinand Magellan was not worth defending because he was unorganized, he forced and threatened natives in the Philippines to convert to his religion of Catholicism and lastly, he was bossy and could care less about the crewmembers needs.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonviolent struggle has been utilized countless times throughout the history of civilization. Contrary to popular belief, many of the world’s greatest wars are fought free of violence. Nonviolent actions offer an alternative approach to conflict resolution; one that does not resort to literal war and prevents blood shedding. The motivation behind these struggles vary, but the desired outcome is always to promote or prevent a change. Conflicts are diverse, and typically they are concerned with social, economic, ethnic, religious, national, humanitarian, and political matters (Sharp, 2005, p. 15).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Breaking News! Indian citizen Mohandas Gandhi is organizing a protest to reduce British taxes on salt, 36 years after he made a compromise with the South African government about Indian suffrage. This was accomplished by what Gandhi and what other Hinduist followers consider satyagraha; or civil disobedience.” I switched the small, tattered, black and white TV off. I was amazed how one leader could bring down a strong government with a big military force, just with civil disobedience. Ever since I was born, we were controlled over British colonial rule. My parents were forced to work as peasants, because all the high-paying jobs were taken by whites. Because of inaccessibility to medical assistance, my mom died. My father was so stricken with…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, if we consider civil disobedience to negatively impact a free society, only two options remain: bitter violence or acceptance of the status quo. The premise that violence is worse than pacifism is easy to accept. People who attempt to evoke social or political change through violence are not revered; they are called terrorists, and they shut down the conversation about whatever injustice they are protesting. For every Martin Luther King, there will be a Malcolm X; for every Mohandas Gandhi, there exists a Rash Behari Bose. Although all four contributed to their cause, only two left behind a legacy of hope that carries on to this day.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the British were resisting independence for India, they wanted Gandhi’s supporters to get angry and become violent because if they did it would hurt the movement for independence. Gandhi built the movement for India’s independence on noncooperation, nonviolent protest and nonviolent intervention. If the supporters of Gandhi became violent it gave the British a reason to lash back and repression the people of India. This would also cause Gandhi’s supporters to lose the advantage of being morally higher than the British. If the people of India were violent it would have ruined Gandhi’s entire movement of independence and what they were fighting…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Protest

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peaceful Protest and civil disobedience have been a hallmark of change from the early 20th century onwards. Though nonviolent efforts, multiple civil movements have peacefully broken a law in order to protest an injustice of said law. Usually done in a coordinated manner by a large group of people, these protest have been strikingly effective in bettering the systems they have set out to change. Peaceful resistance is therefore one of the most effective ways of protesting and correcting unjust and broken laws, and is a staple of free society.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cruel treatment and salt monopoly inspired Gandhi to unify the people in “campaign of satyagraha, or mass civil disobedience.” Salt is a vital part of Indian diet recognized when the Salt Acts were enacted which put a “monopoly over the manufacture and sale of salt”. [1] Gandhi led nonviolent demonstrations as the people defied British policy by making salt from seawater. The British would soon respond by brutally beating the peaceful demonstrators bringing international outrage. By August 1947, Britain caved in to the pressure granting India its independence. Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement influenced India by putting it on the path to become the country we know today.[2] Detractors will say that the ends doesn’t justify the means. They claim that civil disobedience will set a standard for illegality and contempt for the law that others will follow. An example used occurred in 1999 in London where the ‘Carnival against Capitalism’ took place. What started as peaceful protest against economic policy devolved into “self-indulgent violence and destruction of property in the city, achieving nothing but notoriety for its cause.”[3] On the other hand if the law itself is unjust then the people should disobey in order to bring about the greater good not just for themselves but for future…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine gathering in a city with thousands of others protesting the government when all of a sudden tanks come rolling through the city and open firing on the crowd of protesters. These people were using Gandhi’s practice of nonviolence in order to achieve a higher goal. Gandhi believes that passive resistance is the way to better ourselves and our government. Passive resistance though has many rules to it in order to fully work, but sometimes you need violence and force, not Passive Resistance to attain your goal.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    India had struggled for its independence from 1858 to 1947. The British had forced themselves into India which brought economic and social alterations to every day life; destroying traditional Indian values. During the early 1920s Mohandas Gandhi began leading nonviolent resistances against European rule, this method was known as Satyagraha. Gandhi claimed the adoration of India’s people through his philosophies and strong nationalism. Many participated in his nonviolent resistances, and by 1947 the British released India from its grasp. Shortly after India’s achievement of independence, Gandhi was assassinated. After his death, India divided into several countries; India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan; each facing infinite struggles. Mohandas Gandhi had been very effective in unifying India, however, his influence did not last.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Non-violent action controls the power? There is many expression of non-violent actions and they are making a huge development This research will define the term "non-violent action" and explain the meaning of this expression and how they changed the world .…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandela vs. Gandhi

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mohandas Gandhi and Nelson Mandela had many similarities; in fact, Gandhi inspired Mandela. Mandela and Gandhi mostly used peaceful methods to achieve their goals, but Mandela used semi-violent approaches. He bombed bridges (to decrease trade) and sabotaged the election results. Those actions resulted in Mandela sentenced to a life sentence in prison, but fortunately, he was released after serving twenty-seven years. Mandela then joined his releaser, President F. W. de Klerk in work to peacefully dismantle the apartheid in South Africa. Gandhi used peaceful methods throughout his career. He fasted, which means to stop eating until one’s aim is achieved. Fasting helped Gandhi because he was so respected in his community; if he was harmed the British government might have an uprising on their hands. Gandhi also hosted salt marches, in which a large group of people would plunge into the sea and gather salt. This hurt the British government because the Indian people usually relied on them for salt. These public events usually ended in some kind of nonviolent protest. Mandela as well as Gandhi started out as lawyers, and then became an active political leader. Both Mandela and Gandhi were very passionate about their life’s work; in fact, in April 1964 Mandela gave a speech in which he stated, “During my lifetime I have dedicated myself to this struggle of the African people. I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. There has been more than 500 books written about the life and thoughts of Mohandas Gandhi.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays