OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> The Fork Of David Hume
We have many free term papers and essays on The Fork Of David Hume. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
The Fork Of David Hume. The principle that conclusions about what ought
to be cannot be deduced from premises stating only what is ...
... Philosophy 9. HAMMER : TOOL (1) Needle : Pin (2) Fork : Cutlery (3 ... the British
empiricists John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume? functioned, each in his ...
Submitted by lancekim21 on April 19, 2008
Category: Philosophy
Words: 791 | Pages: 4
Views: 114
Popularity Rank: 92,763
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
The principle that conclusions about what ought to be cannot be deduced from premises stating only what is, is sometimes called Hume’s Law. His employment of another distinction between fundamentally different kinds of position is now often nicknamed Hume’s Fork. It is important to realize in both cases that the point is: not that every statement actually made express some proposition falling unequivocally into one or other of this contrasting categories; but rather that we need always to be aware and to to account of the distinction upon which Hume is insisting.
Much the same applies to the Law of the Excluded Middle and to the Law of Non-contradiction. The claim that there can be no middle way between that and not-that, the contention that nothing can be at one in the same time and in the same respect both this and not-this, are to be understood more as prescriptive laws for good thinking than as descriptive laws of actual thought. Certainly, if you ask whether some vague, muddled ambiguous, or otherwise inadequate phrase describe some situation, then the only possible direct answer may be: ‘ It does, and yet it does not. ‘Certainly also, people all too often do believe and assert incompatibles. Yet it is only in so far as respect is shown for consistency that any thought at all, even bad thought, can proceed: there can indeed be no language of any kind saves in so far as there are respected rules determining when its word or other elements are and are not correctly applicable. These Laws of thought, therefore, are to be both understood and cherished, partly as partly defining the essential nature of thought, and partly as describing hypothetical imperative for all those concerned for clarity and truth.
Hume published his great Treatise anonymously, and before he was thirty. He later became dissatisfied, and in the end formally disowned it. In his late thirties, when he had won a reputation with political and general...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!