Preview

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Expectancy Theory of Motivation
Expectancy Theory of Motivation

The three components and relationships in the Expectancy Theory of Motivation are the expectancy component which relates to the effort –performance relationship, the instrumentality theory component which relates to the performance-reward relationship, and the valence theory component which relates to the rewards-personal goals relationship.
Effort – performance relationship is the probability perceived by the individual that exerting a given amount of effort will lead to performance (Judge, 1998). This theory is based on the employee’s assumption that if they work hard and devote their best ability to their job that they will get a good performance appraisal. The Expectancy component describes individuals who thrive on controlling the outcome of their task or project. This individual will assess tasks given and most likely will not accept tasks that they feel are easily obtainable, but on the other hand they also will not accept a task that they perceive as too difficult. This individual likes a challenge but will only agree to the task if he/she believes that they are more than capable of completing the project and meeting the deadline. The situation will lead to a favorable outcome, then that favorable outcome becomes the employee’s motivation and gratification.
Performance – reward relationship is the degree to which an individual believes that performing at a particular level will lead to the attainment of a desired outcome (Judge, 1998). This theory is based on the assumption that employees who get a good performance appraisal will be rewarded by the company in the form of a raise or bonus. The Instrumentality Theory is a component that focuses on individuals who feel they have something to gain if a task is completed successfully. These individuals are motivated by the possibility of public recognition, the expectation of a promotion, and monetary compensation. This individual will strive hard to be successful on a



Bibliography: Judge, T. S. (1998). Organizational Behavior 12th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 208-209

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 210 Week 6 Checkpoint

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    employee’s belief (a) that working hard will allow the person to perform at a high level, and (b) that if the person does perform well, he or she will be rewarded for it (see Figure 7.3). According to this view, motivation is therefore a two-stage process. Several factors determine whether or not employees believe that working hard will lead to a superior job performance. Each of these factors is discussed next.”. We see this as Mary Ellen Sheets founded a company and issued out franchises to those who wanted to be an owner within the company. Mary Ellen Sheets implemented motivation to new franchisee’s by building her own training facility, insuring that new owners were properly prepared from learning how to safely move large things in tricky situations to how to properly send royalties. This achieved the expectancy theory of insuring that those who are operating businesses under her companies name are doing so correctly.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mt302 Unit 8

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior, 14th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/ Prentice Hall.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational behavior. (12th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let1 Task 317.1.1-06

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expectancy theory was developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964 as a systematic explanation of individual motivation within the workplace. This theory put forth three key components: expectancy, performance, and valence. From the base component of the theory, which is expectancy, behavior is built by an individual’s value of the reward or valence. Vroom’s theory of expectancy is used by manager to understand how individual employees are motivated and how they will respond to rewards closely tied to the tasks given. Expectancy is proposed to be an individual’s understanding of how their effort leads to a given performance level. Vroom put forth in his theory that individuals believe the more effort put into a task or objective, the better the performance on the task. Therefore, effort leads to performance or E  P. This effort is closely related to the individual’s belief that they can perform the given task (self-efficacy), whether they believe the task is perceived obtainable, and the individual can control the goal or performance. If the result of a strong effort is a good or exceptional performance, than the result of good performance should be a given outcome, P  O. This outcome should be a reward tied closely to the task and performance. A reward that is tied significant to the performance will help to motivate the individual’s effort. The third key factor of Vroom’s expectancy theory is valence. Valence refers to how much value the individual places on the reward, V(R). Again, the reward should be tied to the outcome, but without a perceived value by the individuals, performance will not put forth any effort to begin with. A summary of the Vroom’s expectancy is seen with the following notation. (Web site, Expectancy Theory, 2013)…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robbin, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt 521 Syllabus

    • 3560 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 3560 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wgu Paper

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expectancy theory is a theory that suggests that the motivation of an individual to perform in a certain manner is dependent on how much the individual anticipates that the performance will be followed by a reward and on how much the said reward means to the individual. In other words, the individual’s motivation is measured by how much an individual wants a reward (Valence), the assessment of the likelihood that the effort will lead to expected performance (Expectancy) and the belief that the performance will lead to reward (Instrumentality). Where valance is the strength of the individual’s preference for a particular reward, Expectancy ca be described as the individual’s confidence in his ability and skill to produce the necessary level of performance and Instrumentality is the individual’s estimate of the chance that by producing the necessary level of performance, it’ll result in various work rewards. The expectancy theory concentrates on the following three relationships:…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2009). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Organizational Behavior (13 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Pentice-Hall.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leraning Team Week 3

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011).Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let1 Task1

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the scenario given Supervisor B should go talk to Supervisor A about the information he received from the conversation with the employees. The supervisors now should try to come up with different solutions using the expectancy theory of motivation. Some of the employees do not believe they are capable of meeting the company goals, the supervisors need to use the first concept in the theory to strengthen the employee’s belief that any effort they put out will produce the performance to meet the company goals. For the employees that do not want to put in the extra…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chrysler LLC Failure

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    merck a company analysis

    • 3426 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.…

    • 3426 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics