OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> Employment Law
We have many free term papers and essays on Employment Law. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
State and Federal Systems as they Pertain to Employment Law. ... Both Federal and State
systems are responsible for administering employment law at various levels. ...
Employment Law Training. ... The company should schedule a mandatory seminar,
held during business hours, for employment law training. ...
Personal Experience In Employment Law. ... Both military and employment law reflect problems
and issues facing both the personnel and the institution. ...
State v Federal: A Comparison of Employment Law. ... Employment law for business (4th
ed.). : The McGraw-Hill Companies. CCH Business Owner's Toolkit (nd). ...
Employment Law. ... Employment Law Guide Chapter: Occupational Safety and Health.
http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/osha.htm Retrieved December 13, 2007). ...
Submitted by playgirl2782 on August 10, 2007
Category: Business
Words: 700 | Pages: 3
Views: 176
Popularity Rank: 60,646
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
I. Disparate Impact is defined as where an employer is not motivated by discriminatory intent. Title VII prohibits an employer from using a facially neutral employment practice that as an unfair unfavorable impact on members of a protected class. The United States Supreme court first described the disparate impact theory in 1971, in the Griggs v. Duke Power Company (401 U.S 424). Title VII also goes on to confirm that disparate impact "proscribes not only overt discrimination but also practices that are in fair form, but discriminatory in operation." Examples of practices that may be subject to disparate impact include written test, height and weight requirements, educational requirements, and subjective procedures, such as interviews.
II. Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1971) was a court case brought before the United States Supreme Court on December 12, 1970. Duke Power Company did not allow African-American employees to be promoted out of the Labor Department. Duke Power Company enforced this by requiring employees to have a high school diploma in order to be promoted out of the Labor Department which in most cases African Americans did not have. The issue was whether the new law banned Duke Power Company from requiring a high school education and the passing of a standardized general intelligence test as conditions of employment when the standards were not significantly related to the job performance. African Americans were not qualified by the standards at a largely higher rate than Caucasian applicants and the jobs at issue had beforehand only been filled by Caucasians as part of an ancient practice of discrimination. Based on the Civil Rights Act, they changed their policy such that one of two high school equivalency tests could stand in the place of a high school diploma.
III. The 8-0 Supreme Court decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Company established new definitions of employment discrimination. The United States Supreme Court ruled against a...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!