Preview

Embryonic Stem Cells In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Embryonic Stem Cells In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Since 1973, millions of innocent and helpless unborn humans have been murdered, ripped apart limb by limb. Their dead bodies are turned over to be dissected and tested on, only to discover more about embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are cells in an unborn child’s body that can become any cell in the human body. In a lab, these cells can be reproduced and- if further research is conducted- can be used to create body parts. Having been read in class, the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley relates to embryonic stem cells, for both Frankenstein’s creature and embryonic stem cells cause the destruction of many people. In Frankenstein, a young scientist named Victor Frankenstein discovers how to create life and creates a creature that he …show more content…
James Thomson first derived human embryonic stem cells from a human embryo. (Top 50) Soon after this discovery, the Bush administration restricted embryonic stem cell research and withdrew all federal funding from it because it required killing unborn children. (Stadelmann, Magnus) For many research facilities, this slowed their research considerably, but over a few years, funding from private owners and even states renewed stem-cell research, causing the United States to lead embryonic stem cell research. (Stadelmann) Although there has been controversy about embryonic stem cell research throughout the government, a vast amount of controversy is between everyday people. According to a survey taken to pass an embryonic stem cell research bill in Switzerland, voters who attended church were more likely to vote against the bill. (Stadelmann) In addition, some groups, such as the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, or conservative churches, believe that the embryo should not be used for researched at all. (Amandito) Judaism and Islam, however, believe that the embryo can be used before it is 40 days old. (Amandito) During the survey, they also found liberal and social democrat parties were 24.1 percent more likely to support embryonic stem cell research compared to Christian democrats. (Stadelmann) When faced with embryonic stem cell …show more content…
To obtain embryonic stem cells, some researchers fertilize an egg and sperm cell in a laboratory; after having grown for a few days, they destroy the embryo to extract the stem cells from the center of the embryo. Essentially, this creates a potential human being and destroys it. Creating human life only to destroy it is morally wrong because “just as an infant is a human being in the infant stage,” “a human embryo is a human in the embryonic stage.” (Amandito) This is not just a collection of human cells, but a stage in a person's life, which every human was once at. “If an embryo will later become a human being, then it should be given the respect of a human being.” (Amandito) Moreover, some researchers take embryonic stem cells from aborted fetuses and use their dead bodies to extract stem cells. Though this is still a human embryo, it is much more complex than a fertilized embryo. “An early embryo that has still not yet been implanted into the uterus does not have the psychological, emotional, or physical properties [of a grown human]” (Embryonic Stem) However, with aborted fetuses, they all have these properties. The average week for an abortion is 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, the fetus can breathe, has a heartbeat, and has measurable brain waves. Furthermore, the human fetus has fingers, toes, a nose, and all its appendages, resembling an adult human.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cell Research Is Not Ethical. Dennis P. Hollinger. At Issue: The Ethics of Genetic Engineering. Ed. Maurya Siedler. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005.…

    • 2675 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real controversy in stem cell research lays in the termination (abortion) of the embryo, which is an entirely independent debate altogether. The embryonic stem cells extracted for research are being derived from embryos that are being aborted regardless (Johansen). Therefore, there is a macrocosmic debate more powerful than the one about stem cell research itself. By harvesting these stem cells from babies predestined to abortion, at least a contribution is being made to society – one that can benefit a multitude of people, perhaps suffering from a multitude of conditions. Even if one wants to debate the ethics of stem cell research, the researchers are being ethically unethical, with regard to the abortions guaranteed to take place.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2009, President Barack Obama used an executive order to lift certain limitations on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research (“Embryos and Unintended Consequences”). In 1973, the United States legalized abortion with the landmark supreme court case Roe vs. Wade. According to The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, stems cells are, “a renewable source of tissue that can be coaxed to become different cell types of the body.” Embryonic stem cells in particular are, “stem cells derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro—in an in vitro fertilization clinic—and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors” (Stem Cell Basics III). The conflict of what is considered “ethical” in regards to unborn human…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is an age-old question. The pro-life versus pro-choice debate has been argued for many years now. The stem cell debate is a similar concept, but the biggest difference is in most states a fetus can be aborted until they are 20 weeks old (editors, shape.com)! Whereas, embryonic stem cells come from embryos 3-5 days old. A common misconception with embryonic stem cells is that the child is getting taken away from their mother. This is because embryonic stem cells come from leftover vitro fertilizations so the cells would have gone to waste but instead are gone to help other people. These fertilization centers often have extra frozen cells. Many consider not using these cells is a waste (cirm). An important aspect to note is the difference between a fetus and an embryo. An embryo is an organism from the moment of fertilization to the 8 week mark. Whereas a fetus is from 8 weeks to the moment of birth (O’brien).According to Theresa Ellefson, mother and biology teacher, “ although I think that the pros of embryonic stem cell research outweigh the cons, I am not the mother of the embryo, and if I was it might alter my opinion.” This is a common opinion with mothers because they know how many benefits can come from the cells but they also do not want to volunteer their eggs. Although embryonic stem cells are not directly taken away from mothers, they are still sensitive with giving up their…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent(able to grow) stem cells derived from the inner cell mass of a blastocyst, an early-stage preimplantation embryo. Embryonic stem cells can form any possible cells in the body. These stem cells are used to better understand and treat diseases. They also help scientist understand how diseases occur/develop. Rapid advantages in research on the embryonic stem cells derived from human embryos have collided with opposing views regarding the morality of using human embryos for these purposes. Seeing that there are laws on almost everything, there are laws on stem cells as well. These laws have been a big source of controversy and they vary by country. In Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Greece, Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands, stem cell research using the human embryo is permitted in these countries. While in Germany, Austria, Ireland, Italy and Portugal, it is illegal.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro-Choice of Abortion

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nearly all abortions take place within the first trimester of the pregnancy. Within that time, the fetus cannot exist outside of the mother’s tummy. It is attached by the umbilical cord, and therefore depends on the mother’s health for survival. If it cannot survive on its own, the fetus is technically not a person yet, and being a living person is very different from the concept of human life…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, author Mary Shelley suggests that when science is not used responsibly by man, it can become out of control. Mary Shelley warns readers of the dangers that come with the advancement of technology and the potential risks that emerge when science is raised godlike standards. Today, science and technology are advancing much more rapidly than is our wisdom to use them properly. Due to this, science and technology are becoming the equivalent of modern day ‘monsters’. Reproductive cloning on humans is a prominent scientific and technological advancement that poses issues regarding human control and manipulation over the natural world and morality. With these advancements come risks. The main risk being that reproductive…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the heart of the political debate about whether the federal government should sponsor and pay for the research of embryonic stem cell is the cultural and political idea of when human life begins. This question is the most important one in the process of either banning or allowing and funding the research. It is clear that murder is against both the moral/ethical and legal code in this country and in most others. The question of whether life begins at conception; a point of view taken by pro-life activists, or whether life begins later on in the process when the egg forms a sense of…

    • 2512 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This debate on embryonic stem cell research has held on over three decades. The controversy has not ended at this time. The controversy is about the work that holds immense promises from the scientific end and the opponents who view them as giving less value to human life. The most recent debate uses the very early part of development of stem cells for the potential to be alleviate conditions ranging from diabetes to Alzheimer's Disease. In 2001 the Bush Administration proclaimed a policy that permits some research with federal funds used with very strict rules. This policy has gathered little support three years later from the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro-Life

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abortion is the killing of an unborn child, or in other words, murder. The unborn child is in fact a living human being. Although some may disagree that the baby is living while in the womb, it can be proven scientifically otherwise. Erick Eckholm in the New York Times online quoted Dr. Eric Webb, an obstetrician, who said, “With the union of the egg and sperm, that is life, and genetically human.” It is human at the moment of egg and sperm coming together. Rob Schwarzwalder similarly explained in his online article on Family Research Council, “The zygote is composed of human DNA and other human molecules, so its nature is undeniably human and not some other species. . . It is also quite clear to us that the earliest human embryo is biologically alive. It fulfills the four criteria needed to establish biological life: metabolism, growth, reaction to stimuli, and reproduction.” He makes the argument very clear that when the sperm and egg fuse together, a new entity that is distinctly human becomes alive and an individual. He also discusses that the new human zygote has a genetic composition that is different from any other human, including the mother (Schwarzwalder). All of these facts contribute to the fact that this baby is not just an extension of the mother’s body alone, but it is a new and unique human being. Mary Balch bluntly states in her article online for USA Today, “The fetus, in many cases, dies just as a human adult or child would: It bleeds to death as it is torn limb from limb.” When you decide to abort, you are technically killing an irreplaceable living person.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Abortion really murder. Give about 266 days after conception and see what emerges from the womb. It will be a human baby, not a horse, a fish or an honey badger. When a human egg and sperm unite, the result is a fetus. Within 3 week you can hear a heartbeat. At 4 weeks you are able to pick out facial features, arms and legs. Nerves and brain waves are in place by eight weeks after conception. At 12 weeks breathing of fluid for oxygen. So is this a fetus or a human? That is still up to interpretation. Legal rights have stepped in but, yet they are broken all the time.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stem Cell Research

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stem cell research has been happening for 30 or more years through bone marrow transplants, but has only been a major debate for about the past ten years with the first isolation of embryonic stem cells (UMichigan). According to a popular issues website the definition of stem cells is, "… contrasted with "differentiated" cells. They offer much hope for medical advancement because of their ability to grow into almost any kind of cell” (Pros and Cons…). One of the main debates is between stem cell research and religious views. Some religions such as branches Christianity believe that obtaining and using embryonic stem cells is a sin and should not be used for research or otherwise. Even though I identify as a Christian, I believe that stem cells should be utilized, as long as an egg is not fertilized only for the use of stem cells.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arguing Fetal Tissue

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is such a controversial topic and hit really “hit’s a nerve” with so many. Whether you feel life begins at conception or later in the pregnancy really has no baring and is of little argument if we are using already aborted fetuses. There would be no monetary gain to the mother, there would be no incentive to abort a fetus, and it will merely be an alternative to disposal of the aborted fetus. Why waste what is readily available and could potentially enrich and lengthen the lives of those…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main argument pertaining to abortion is whether or not a fetus is a "person" that is "indistinguishable from the rest of us" and if it deserves rights equal to women's. On this question there is a tremendous spectrum of religious, philosophical, scientific, and medical opinion, but it all really depends on who you ask. It's been argued for centuries. Fortunately, our society has recognized that each woman must be able to make this decision, based on her own conscience. To impose a law defining a fetus as a "person," granting it rights equal to or superior to a woman's, thinking, feeling, conscious human being, is not only arrogant but absurd. It only serves to diminish a woman's value. (Heritage House 76, Inc.)Under the view of pro choice supporters the embryo is not a baby since it can not survive and live outside the uterus since it receives everything needed to survive from the mother's body. In a sense the fetus dies but it was never living to begin with so it can not be considered an act of murder as pro-lifers would argue. More simply consider acorns and trees. (Robinson) Just as an acorn is a fertilized egg of the oak, that does not make it a tree. Sure it has the potential to become an oak tree, but it has not yet grown to that…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Life Vs Pro Choice

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lee and George expand on the idea that “the human embryo, from conception onward, is fully programmed actively to develop himself or herself to the mature stage of a human being, and, unless prevented by disease or violence, will actually do so” (2). The moment the sperm and egg combine is when a living creature begins to form. Every single individual began as a human the size of a pinkie-everyone still grows and evolves into a more mature individual, just as any age person grows more everyday. It is human nature to finish whatever you start; you can’t just kill a flower right before it begins to bloom. A beating heart and developing brain begin to form as soon as four weeks after conception. In “Why I Am Pro-Life”, Thomas Friedman recalls the importance of having a presence on this Earth and that “respect for life has to include respect for how that life is lived, enhanced and protected — not only at the moment of conception but afterward” (4). Life is a gift should be treasured, not something where you can just get rid just because you made a mistake. When a woman gets an abortion, she is depriving the child of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. So how exactly do you define life? Life is any creature that is growing and has a niche in a certain environment; this includes the “clump of cells” that will evolve and flourish into a…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays