Preview

Edward VI and Royal Authority

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
696 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward VI and Royal Authority
To what extent did Edward IV restore royal authority in the years 1471 1483?

Edward IV restored some elements of royal authority in the years 1471 – 1483, he had destroyed his opposition or forced them into exile, he used family member to control more volatile regions and took a keen interest in law and order. In addition he improved the English economy and made a somewhat successful invasion of France. Although some would argue that Edward failed at restoring Royal authority because his heirs were only young at his time of death, Nobel rivalry thought England and his foreign policy had begun to go wrong.
Firstly Edward forced his enemies to flee to countries in exile or killed them. This was important in restoring royal authority because otherwise these people could revolt or usurp him. One example of this was when Edward forced Warwick to flee to France and then his armies killed Warwick on the battlefield at Barnet. This allowed Edward to secure and consolidate royal authority in England.
Secondly Edward outsourced some power to his nobles for them to protect and manage more volatile regions in England. Tis allowed the restoration of royal authority because it made sure that Edward had loyal nobles spread out across the country in strongholds, this would help stop rebellions and foreign armies invading. One example of this is when Edward gave his brother Richard duke of Gloseter the task of governing the north. The north at this time was a volatile region wit several disloyal lords to Edward as well as Scottish skirmishers crossing the borders into England.
Thirdly Edward took a keen interest in the law. He began to assume the judgement seat in Westminster. This gave him control of any Nobel who ended up there being accused of crimes, this therefore allowed Edward to have more influence and helped restore royal authority. Another example is that Edward went on Judicial process thought England and this helped him spread his power base and gave him more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henrys complex financial policies were important in his control of the nobility. For example, he used bonds and recognaisances, which were raised for political and financial purposes, to restrain the power of his nobility. Between 1504 and 1508, £50,000 per annum was collected from the bonds, which shows that they obviously contained power in controlling nobles. Another device that Henry used were feudal dues. Wardships were the feudal due which most irked the nobility since it gave the king control of a nobles’ land and it also gave the king control over the marriage of there children, which if the heir was a female could mean that the family lost control of its land entirely. His careful management of crown lands is another example of how Henry’s power over his nobility rested on his successful financial policies. Henry had more crown land than previous monarchs, some lands were confiscated under the acts of attainder and others were reclaimed after the acts of resumption. This secured control and authority over England, and by 1508 his annual income from royal estates had rose from £12,000 in 1486 to £42,000. Finally, Henry used attainders and fines to avoid wars caused by nobles, which had caused problems to previous monarchs. Henry used Acts of Attainders to declare a nobleman guilty of a crime against the crown. The noble might be imprisoned and the attainted…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaining international recognition and influence for England was a big part of Henry’s foreign policy; this was because England had not been an active part of European affairs since the end of the hundred year’s war in 1453. So with Henry’s ascension to the throne and wanting to make g his mark this was a very important factor on judging how effective the foreign policy was because this was one of the more consistent of the factors of the foreign policy from 1515 to 1529. An example was in 1513 Henry gained Tournai and Therouanne, this is a good example of how the foreign policy was effective as Tournai was a significant achievement as although it wasn’t a city of great economic or strategic importance it was internationally known therefore bringing England prestige, this would add to the international recognition got England. The capture of Therouanne in the same year also meant that Henry was gaining…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The actions of the Scottish kingdom towards Edward I and England within the time period of 1286 – 1292 has provided a basis of great scrutiny and speculation over the years. With the death of Alexander III, Scotland was plunged into a Succession Crisis, from which a guardianship was formed to provide governance over the kingdom of Scotland. During the time following Alexander III's death, Edward I became an influential and involved constituent towards this guardianship. However, can the Scottish kingdom's decision to involve the King of England in the country's affairs be perceived as an act of naivety or was it a piece of sensible pragmatism? Furthermore, in events such as the Treaties of both Birgham and Salisbury, along with those of the Great Cause and election of John Balliol as King of Scots, all including Edward I's presence, it is possible that the kingdom of Scotland blindingly accepted the aid of their most powerful neighbour without truly considering the English king's own intentions.…

    • 2792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Robert 1 Important

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The English king Edward 1 had passed away before he could have a final…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward IV’s death caused many issues with regards to power shortly after he died because of many difficulties. This ranges from a complicated will, to the betrayal from his brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester. Shortly before Edward IV’s death, he amended his will, and the only copy of the new will was ruined and nobody ever really knew what changes Edward IV made. Because of this, there was a bitter power struggle. This power struggle revolved around two competing factions, Woodville and Gloucester.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edward IV died suddenly and very unexpectedly. Nobody was prepared for his death and so when he died, nobody knew what to do. Edward V was a minor at the time, and so this meant he could not rule alone. He was only 12 and so would need either a council to govern for him, or a protector. Whoever adopted these roles would essentially be in control of England. Edward IV was well liked during his second reign as King, and so his death threw the country into chaos. Edward V was not in England and so he was not very well located and it took several days for him to receive the news. There was a lot of uncertainty as to what should happen following his death, and the fact that he left two different sets of insturctions only confused things further.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He increased the amount of warships in the Royal Navy from 5 to over 40 and constructed fortifications on the southern coast. Through these efforts, Henry earned the title as the “Father of the English Navy”.Despite frivolous spending on war and luxuries, the dissolution of monasteries brought wealth to England. It pleased the Protestants and furthered the dissolution of Catholicism from the Church of England.Among Henry’s political accomplishments was his granting as Lord of Ireland, as well as the Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 which brought Wales into the English Kingdom. These successes point towards Henry increasing the rule of England over neighboring territories. Henry VIII was certainly not the nicest king in England’s history, but many of his goals were accomplished how he wanted them to be. He obtained his male heir, obtained the necessary power to end his marriages, built drastically upon the Royal Navy, and was awarded numerous titles. In the question of success, not everything has to be completely moral to expect a successful reign. While England was sure to see more tough times ahead, it was certainly not broken or completely exhausted of resources when Henry…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry VIII, the determined Tudor king, pursued an ambitious foreign policy with the goal of making England a powerful force in Europe. He aimed to challenge the French through an active foreign policy, gain recognition and prestige, establish trade connections with the Netherlands, act as a respectable statesman and mediator, and solidify his dynasty by strategically marrying into Scottish and Irish families to gain control over their territories. Henry VIII’s first major impact as a statesman and peacemaker was on the negotiations and finalization of the Treaty of London in 1518. Henry actively took part in the negotiations, aiming to improve diplomatic relations and prevent conflicts between the major European powers. Unfortunately, despite…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    then came Edward IV who was a strong king that sorted out the mess that Henry VI had left behind.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward IV, king of England, died suddenly and prematurely at Windsor castle – perhaps from a stroke, or peritonitis or even a chill caught while on a fishing trip – in April 1483 aged only 40 years. He had enjoyed a relatively successful reign, by the standards of the day, restoring peace after the disordered period of Lancastrian rule and providing his subjects with some much needed stability. Edward IV had been a strong king after 1471, able to control the rival noble factions, but his death opened up a destructive, disastrous Yorkist family feud. The throne should have passed smoothly to his son; Edward V. This however didn’t happen due to his brother, Richard duke of Gloucester wanting the power; Edward changed his will on his death bed so his wishes weren’t clear; his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. On his death a bitter family feud was started.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward II

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The dominant theme of Edward II is the theme of many of Marlowe's (and Shakespeare's) histories: the will to power and ultimately, the corruption inherent in power. Edward isn't murdered because of his affection for Gaveston. Rather, it is because in bestowing such extravagant favors on Gaveston, a commoner, he is subverting the ‘natural’ order of his position, neglecting both his kingdom and his family. He comes to realize that Gaveston wrongs him and he confesses in Act V,Scene III-…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics