OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Economic Development In Three Urban Areas: Atlanta, Baltimore And Cleveland
We have many free term papers and essays on Economic Development In Three Urban Areas: Atlanta, Baltimore And Cleveland. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Economic Development in three Urban Areas: Atlanta, Baltimore and Cleveland.
Executive Summary The following pages review the comprehensive ...
Economic Development in three Urban Areas: Atlanta, Baltimore and Cleveland.
Executive Summary The following pages review the comprehensive ...
... due to the mass infrastructure development in the ... and tourism often leads to better
economic growth ... The highest total arrivals were recorded three months after ...
... ILO-IPEC, 'bear witness to a three-fold convictions ... Site Association, Karachi and
Skill Development Councils are ... the rights of children from economic and socio ...
... infections in humans and approximately one to three million deaths ... The economic impact
includes ... a mosquito bite, but they prevent the development of malaria ...
Submitted by laurie210 on April 6, 2005
Category: Social Issues
Words: 6259 | Pages: 26
Views: 570
Popularity Rank: 13,943
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Executive Summary
The following pages review the comprehensive strategies that have been used by the cities of Atlanta, Baltimore and Cleveland to improve their economic conditions. It should become apparent to the reader that the fate of each city is determined by many factors including historical events, the balance of power between stakeholder groups, the ability of the city to capitalize on federal programs and the relationships between the private sector and the community. Unfortunately, no clear winning strategy arose from each city's economic development efforts; they all caused both gainers and losers.
Atlanta is a city that is led by business leadership whose main priority is to promote business interests that are at times at odds with the communities' development. Baltimore, with very little private investment, relies heavily on its citizens' involvement whose collective bargaining and activism have hindered its political leadership's attempts at growth. Cleveland has fallen victim to "ivory tower" leadership that has led to financial mismanagement and increased community frustration.
I have attempted to review the last decade in each city, and in the context of that city examine the strengths and weaknesses of their actions. The scope of this project is large. To focus the reader's attention on the difficulty the cities have experienced in trying to meet their stakeholders' needs and expectations, I have chosen to focus on a few specific actions that were taken in each city to promote economic development. This discussion is by no means exhaustive; additional learnings can be gleamed from further research.
Atlanta
Atlanta's political and social structure and development has been characterized by what author Clarence Stone labels regime politics in his book Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta: 1946-1989. The regime's determining factor is the loosely formed coalitions and collaborations between the white...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!