OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Dredging The Bay
We have many free term papers and essays on Dredging The Bay. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Dredging the Bay, will lead to a Lifetime of Marine Disarray. ... Furthermore, through
dredging Port Phillip Bay the balance of the ecosystem will be disrupted. ...
Dredging the bay. ... On the contrary, it can be argued that dredging the bay will result
in a more efficient transport of goods with fewer ships required. ...
... A dredging project to build a land mass as big as nine city blocks began in 1939. ...
The last leg of the San Pedro Bay breakwater began construction in 1941. ...
... and wastewater treatment facilities, played in contamination of the Chesapeake Bay.
After collecting a number of oysters from six different dredging sites, the ...
... Dredging reduced PCB levels in rivers and fish in locations such as the Fox River
(Wisc.), Manistique Harbor (Mich.), Cumberland Bay (NY) and Waukegan Harbor ...
Submitted by bobjane123 on May 15, 2007
Category: Social Issues
Words: 598 | Pages: 3
Views: 80
Popularity Rank: 97,512
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As of the 22nd of March 2007, the Port of Melbourne The Port of Melbourne Corporation\'s Supplementary Environment Effects Statement regarding the deepening of Port Phillip bay has been announced. The plan is set to cost seven hundred and thirty million dollars. The procedure will involve moving twenty-six million cubic metres of sand, silt and rock. In the process, much marine life will be greatly affected, resulting in an imbalance in the marine ecosystem. Certainly Australia cannot simply overlook the negative effects and carry forth we the dredging.
Indeed, if the dredging were to take place it would cost a massive seven hundred and thirty-three million dollars of tax payer’s money. This money could be wiser spent on more immediate issues of today. Such as Australia’s severely increasing drought and water shortages. This money could be better spent on water recycling, desalination plants, health or education. These key imperative areas are where we should be spending our tax payer’s money. Conversely, the opposition may argue that dredging the bay will provide to be an investment in the future in that it is expected to provide a three-to-one cost-benefit ratio, providing two billion two hundred millions dollars in return. However, if the final costs blow out which is a possible risk then the ratio is far less impressive. As a result we must not dredge the bay as the money could be better spent dealing with more appropriate issues such as drought, water conservation, health and education.
Furthermore, through dredging Port Phillip Bay the balance of the ecosystem will be disrupted. Microscopic algae which are the source for food for millions of marine life will be lost. The number of fish will drop dramatically, endangering dolphins consequently. Anchovies will further be dropped resulting in tens of thousands of penguins from the bay and Phillip Island going hungry. All these changes have a chain...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!