Preview

Do You Believe in Miracles

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1580 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do You Believe in Miracles
Ami Denman
Dr. Anderson
Phil 1043
4/26/13

Do You Believe In Miracles?

Do you believe in miracles? I find it rather intriguing that some people still try to use science or any number of other disciplines as a way of explaining, give meaning or rationalizing the question of miracles or the existence of a higher power. I find it hard to understand why humans deny at least the possibility that everyday life presents us with mysteries that cannot simply be explained by human reasoning, rational explanations, the laws of science, or by the laws of nature, but instead just simply acknowledge that some things are unexplainable or justifiable and just miraculous. Although the belief in miracles have seemly been acknowledged as factual for centuries in works such as the Bible, many philosophers and scientists still question the validity of a miraculous event or experience and refuse to ascribe to the reasonable explanation that some things in the natural world cannot be proved by the method of science and are explicitly miraculous. A miracle can be defined by Hume as a ʻtransgression of a law of nature by the violation of a particular deity or invisible agentʼ. For scholars such as Maurice Wiles, Alastair McKinnon, and Steven Bayne a miracle can never occur because the actual concept of a miracle is incoherent. Bayne states, “Given Hume’s view on the nature of belief and belief production, it seems…that we should begin not by asking whether belief in a miracle can be rationally justified, but by asking whether a belief in a miracle is even possible.” However, I will aim to demonstrate why miracles can occur because ultimately the definition of miracles put forward by David Hume is archaic and irrelevant to today’s society. David Hume proposed a theoretical and practical case for why it is impossible for one ever to know if a miracle has occurred. His theoretical case begins by stating that all our knowledge comes from sensory experience and empirical evidence



Bibliography: Anghel. Alexandru. “Hume On Miracles and the Lourdes Phenomenon”. Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies 4.6(2012):25-32. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. “Are Miracles Identifiable?” Web. 10 Apr. 2013. www.thywordistruth.com/Miracles/miracles.pdf Bayne, Steven M. “Hume On Miracles: Would It Take A Miracle To Believe In A Miracle?”. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 45,1,pp 1-29, Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. Corner, David. “Miracles.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. March 24 2005. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. www.thestudentchatroom.co.uk/Wiki/Revision:Miracles Corner, David. “Philosophy of Miracles.” Continuum Studies in Philosophy. International Publishing Group. Jan 21 2007: p 17. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Cowan, Steven B., and James S. Spiegel, Loving Wisdom: A Christian Introduction to Philosophy. Nashville: B&H Academic, 2009. Frost-Arnold, Greg. "The No-Miracles Argument For Realism: Inference To An Unacceptable Explanation." Philosophy Of Science 77.1 (2010): 35-58. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. Larmer, Robert. “Miracles, Divine Agency, And The Laws Of Nature.” Toronto Journal Of Theology 27.2(2011): 267-290. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Apr. 2013. McKinnon, Alastair. “Miracles and Paradox.” American Philosophical Quartely 4. (Oct 1967):308-14 Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Yurs, Mark E. “The Ethics Of Preaching On The Healing Of Jesus.” Clergy Journal 85.1 (2008): 12-14. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Apr. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reoccurring miracles that Jeremiah performs throughout the novel Peace Like A River by Leif Enger are motifs that support the them in the novel. The miracles in the novel show that Jeremiah could solve the problems at hand including curing Reuben's breathing eventually even if it doesn't seem possible. Reuben's breathing problems were a battle he had to face throughout the book and it ties itself to the them. These miracles are shown through several chapters in the novel. The first miracle that Jeremiah did in the novel was int eh first chapter when Reuben was born. Reuben somehow survives even his lungs weren't working because Jeremiah performs a miracle by saying " 'Reuben Land int he name of the living God I'm telling you to breathe.'…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Rene’ Descartes – Established importance of skeptical review of all received wisdom (17th century); argued that human reason could then develop laws that would explain the fundamental workings of nature.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To discuss the argument of Hume on miracles, Mackie says we must first develop definitions of laws and miracles that does not automatically mean that the concept of a miracle is incoherent or is logically impossible the miracle occurs. ~ Mackie notes that if we define a miracle as a violation of a law of nature and set a law to be a pattern of how the world works, then it is impossible that the miracle occurs. These definitions imply that the bill violated the miracle was not really a law, because it is an exception; eZeentis thus not a miracle, because it does not violate any law. But that argument Hume and Mackie said that to dis- cuss Hume's argument we need different definitions of laws and miracles. We need an account of the laws and miracles…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existence of ghosts can also have logical explanations or simple ignorance of unscientific techniques. In a similar though, the value assumption made by the author was that ghosts, according to many studies and logical research, do not exist on any circumstance. In contrast, the reality assumption, according to Benjamin Radford, ghosts as other unproven phenomenons do exists but searching in the right place with evidence to suggest so. The value and reality assumptions can be tested to be true or false with specific tests or procedures to see if ghosts really exists and not having scientific or logical explanation. Benjamin Radford conducted this analytical evidence to deny the existence of ghosts.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GP_Science_and_religion

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Extension Lecture 3: Science and Religion 21 April & 25 April 2014 “Science without Religion is lame; Religion without Science is blind” – Albert Einstein ‘God is the Ultimate Scientist’ – Anonymous Lecture Outline 1. What is science? 2. What is religion? 3.…

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume puts forward two separate but very closely related arguments against miracles. Hume argues that the probability of miracles actually happening is so low that is irrational and illogical to believe that miracles do occur. Hume is an empiricist, meaning that he emphasises experience and observations of the world as the way of learning new things.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is human nature to question our existence. Some believe it was God who created our existence, and others rely on science. This has been an ongoing debate since life on earth. This paper argues that it is not possible to prove either way whether if the traditional God exists or not. There are no credentials to prove God’s existence or lack of; it is merely a belief. Some may rely on the Bible as proof although there is no way to prove the stories within true.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume argues future matters of fact are considered knowledge on the basis of cause and effect relationships. He declares that in order to satisfy our knowledge of future matters of fact, it is necessary for us to foremost question how we arrived at the knowledge of cause and effect. Cause and effect relationships are plainly unattainable; we can only make inferences concerning future matters of fact. Hume suggests, “No object ever discovers, by the qualities which appear to the senses, either the causes which produce it or the effects which will arise from it; nor can our reason, unassisted by experience, ever draw any inference concerning real existence and future matters of fact” (Hume, 241). Humans have habit of visualizing one event following another, and declaring the first event causes the second. Hume rejects such an idea, arguing that we cannot declare any inferences taken from past experiences as knowledge of future matters of fact. As Hume addresses the principle of induction, he claims that there is always room for error when making and inductive inference.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    God has always been an abstract subject for me. Throughout the entirety of my life I have never had a clear understanding of what God is, or even if there is a God. However, even though I never had a clear understanding of God or how we could even know of him, Descartes and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However, David Hume would refute these claims saying, through his dialogues that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Approaching the Question of God 's Existence. Pointe Case Presentation: Lesson 18. [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from Liberty BlackBoard…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It may be safe to say that everyone at one time or another has seen something out of the ordinary. Some would even call these rare occurrences “miracles.” What qualifies as a miracle differs from person to person based on their own beliefs. Some believe in fate, and predetermined destiny, and some would write off extraordinary and seemingly supernatural events as merely coincidence. Many find solace in religion, and believe that many happenings, if not everything, are miracles from God. Those who consider themselves religious might even consider themselves more grateful for life’s so called many miracles. Gabriel Garcia Marquez addresses this issue in his short story “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings.” The old saying “seeing is believing” does not apply to the characters of this story, as they struggle to make sense of such an outlandish old man, that appears to be an angel. This satirical piece uses the old man as a symbol of faith and religion to mock the role that they play in people’s lives, as well as the overall skeptical nature of humans in general.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays