OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Descartes
We have many free term papers and essays on Descartes. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Descartes Descartes How does Descartes try to extricate himself from the sceptical doubts that he has raised? Does he succeed? by Tom Nuttall [All page references
Descartes And How He Tried To Remove Himself From His Skeptical Point Jeffrey Laino Ramapo College In the Meditations, Descartes embarks upon what Bernard Williams
Descartes: ttrue belief and knowledge Descartes: True belief and Knowledge Descartes overall objective in the Meditations was to develop a system of true belief
Rene Descartes Ren? Descartes and his Cartesian system influenced philosophers and scientists of his time, but his work was opposed by Pierre Gassendi and his Epicurean
Descartes' Meditations Descartes' Meditations Descartes overall objective in the Meditations is to question knowledge. To explore such metaphysical issues as the
Submitted by Dingo on April 7, 2006
Category: Philosophy
Words: 605 | Pages: 3
Views: 257
Popularity Rank: 53,490
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Paper Proposal I
1. Thesis:
Descartes seems to jump to his conclusion of the existence of God without much reasoning listed. I will argue that what he has written in his Discourse on Methods and Meditations is not a good enough argument to prove God's existence decisively.
2. Argument:
Descartes has five arguments for the existence of God:
1. All we can know about finite substances is they are spatially extended.
2. The mind can produce items about finite substances because it has an idea of itself as a finite substance.
3. As a finite substance, the mind could not produce the idea of an infinite substance.
4. Therefore, the idea of an infinite substance must be implanted by a God.
Descartes argument is basically: I could not have the idea of God, if a God did not exist to implant the knowledge of an infinite object into my mind. I want to argue for a number of points brought up by Tweyman, but my main argument will be that a finite can have an understanding of an infinite object. As stated in Descartes, a finite object can understand what defines a finite object. If a finite object can define what is a finite object, then it can, also, know what is not a finite object. Anything that is not a finite object must be an infinite object. I will, also, try to dispute some of Stamos' arguments to make sure that the argument I'm forming does not contain any holes.
3. Literature & It's Use:
A) Descartes' Discourse on Methods and Meditations.
(I will draw from Descartes' Methods to document his views about why he thinks that he can prove the existence of God.)
B) Stanley, Tweyman, "The idea of God and Descartes' Proofs of God's Existence in the
Third Meditation", Dialogos, Vol 39, #84, July 2004, 71-76.
(I will try to help justify Tweyman's reasoning for not believing that Descartes gave enough evidence...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!