Consolidated Vision From Culture And Imperialism Analysis
“Consolidated vision” from culture and imperialism:
It is an essay by Edward said published in 1993.Said tries to follow the relation between the culture and the imperialism during the last three centuries.This eassy influenced by his previous book Orinentlism, published in 1987. Said convinces the impact of dominant culture basically the British writers of the 19th and 20th century, for example, Rudyard Kipling and Jane Austen on imperialism and colonialism throughout three novels. He defines imperialism as “the practice, the theory, and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan center ruling a distant territory”. His definition of culture is complicated, but he insists that we shouldn’t forget its connection with imperialism when we …show more content…
Assimilation involves those who are colonized being forced to conform to the cultures and traditions of the colonizers. Gauri Viswanathan points out that “cultural assimilation is… the most effective form of political action”. Because “cultural domination works by consent and often precedes conquest by force” (85). Colonizing governments realize that they gain strength, not necessarily through physical control, but through mental control. This mental control is implemented through a central intellectual location and the school system. Because colonial education is “directed at absorption into the metropolis and not separate and dependent development of the colonized in their own society and culture” (4). Colonial education strips the colonized people away from their indigenous learning structures and draws them toward the structures of the colonizers. Much of the reasoning that favors such a learning system comes from supremacist ideas of the colonizers. .” The ultimate goal of colonial education is this: “We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in
It is an essay by Edward said published in 1993.Said tries to follow the relation between the culture and the imperialism during the last three centuries.This eassy influenced by his previous book Orinentlism, published in 1987. Said convinces the impact of dominant culture basically the British writers of the 19th and 20th century, for example, Rudyard Kipling and Jane Austen on imperialism and colonialism throughout three novels. He defines imperialism as “the practice, the theory, and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan center ruling a distant territory”. His definition of culture is complicated, but he insists that we shouldn’t forget its connection with imperialism when we …show more content…
Assimilation involves those who are colonized being forced to conform to the cultures and traditions of the colonizers. Gauri Viswanathan points out that “cultural assimilation is… the most effective form of political action”. Because “cultural domination works by consent and often precedes conquest by force” (85). Colonizing governments realize that they gain strength, not necessarily through physical control, but through mental control. This mental control is implemented through a central intellectual location and the school system. Because colonial education is “directed at absorption into the metropolis and not separate and dependent development of the colonized in their own society and culture” (4). Colonial education strips the colonized people away from their indigenous learning structures and draws them toward the structures of the colonizers. Much of the reasoning that favors such a learning system comes from supremacist ideas of the colonizers. .” The ultimate goal of colonial education is this: “We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in