Preview

Conflict Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9877 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict Theory
CHAPTER 10

Conflict Theory
A. Oberschall

This essay covers three broad topics. First, there has been renewed debate about human nature and the roots of intergroup violence and warfare in evolutionary biology, in psychology, and in anthropology. The “ordinary man” hypothesis explains why and how humans justify and participate in violence and atrocities. Second, in addition to interstate wars, political scientists have been studying insurgencies, ethnic cleansing, civil wars, genocide, ethnic riots, and other modes of violence called “new wars.” Based on hundreds of case studies, comparative research and large quantitative data sets, they have theorized about the root causes and dynamics of these conflicts, and about prevention, deterrence, conflict management, and peace making. Third, the social movement and collective action field in sociology developed a mobilization theory for explaining why and how relatively powerless groups confront regimes, how the dynamics of confrontations escalate to civil strife, what outcomes result, and whether violence was necessary for change. All three research traditions contribute insights and findings for conflict theory. In the conclusion, I argue that a theory of conflict should integrate group with state/regime centered analysis (micro with the macro), give more weight to dynamics than to root causes, and make conflict management an equal partner with violent conflict.

HUMAN NATURE AND WARFARE
The psychologist Robert Hinde writes that (1997) “Certain behavioral propensities, including the capacity for aggression, are common to virtually all humans. This does not mean that they are genetically determined …humans have a capacity to be both aggressive and altruistic…the behavior shown depends on a host of developmental, experiential, social and circumstantial factors.” Although sociobiologists assume that genes exist for specific behavioral dispositions, like “self-sacrificial bravery in warfare” (Tiger and Fox 1971),



References: Atran, Scott. 2003. “The Surprises of Suicide Terrorism, DISCOVER 24 (10) October. Balencie, Jean-Marc and Arnaud de la Grange. 2005. Les Nouveaux Mondes Rebelles. Paris: Michalon. Beissinger, Mark. 2002. National Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge University Press. Browning, Christopher. 1992. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Collins. Burstein, Paul. 1998. Discrimination, Jobs and Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Chirot, Daniel and Clark McCauley. 2006. Why Not Kill Them All? The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Coakley, John, ed. 2003. The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict. London: Frank Cass. Collier, Paul et al., 2003. Breaking the Conflict Trap. Civil War and Development Policy. Washington D.C.: World Bank. Cohen, Ronald. 1984. “Warfare and State Formation: Wars Make States and Statess Make Wars” in Brian Ferguson ed. Warfare, Culture and Environment. New York: Academic Press. Crocker Chester, et al. 2001. Turbulent Peace.The Challenges of Managing International Conflict. Washington D.C.: The United States Institute of Peace. Darby, John ed., 2006. Violence and Reconstruction. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Darby, John and Roger Mac Ginty, eds. 2000. The Management of Peace Processes. New York: Palgrave. Doyle, Michael and Nicholas Sambanis. 2006. Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Doyle, Michael and Nicholas Sambanis. 2000. “International Peace Building: a Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis” American Political Science Review 94 (4), xxx–xxxx. Edgerton, Robert. 2000. “Traditional Beliefs and Practices. Are Some Better Than Others ?” in Lawrence Harrison and Samuel Huntington, Culture Matters. How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books. Fearon, James. 2003. “Why Do Some Civil Wars Last Longer Than Others?” Political Science Dept., Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Fearon, James, and David Laitin. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War” American Political Science Review 97 (1), xxxx–xxxx. Fein, Helen, 1979. Accounting for Genocide. New York: Free Press. Ferguson, R. Brian. 2006. “Archeology, Cultural Anthropology and the Origins and Intensification of War” Chapter 13 in Elizabth Arkush and Mark Allen, eds., The Archeology of Warfare. Prehistories of Raiding and Conquest. Gainsville: University Press of Florida. Gagnon, V. P., “1994/95. “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflicts” International Security 19(3), 130–66. Gamba, Virginia. 2006. “Post-Agreement Demobilization, Disarmament, and Reconstruction” in John Darby ed. Violence and Reconstruction. (pp. 53–76). South Bend, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press. Gamson, William. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont CA: Wadsworth. Gamson, William. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 192 A. Oberschall Giugni, Marco, Charles Tilly and Doug McAdam, eds. 1998. How Movements Matter, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Gleditsch, Nils Petter et al, 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: a New Dataset” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5), 615–637. Goodwin, Jeff and James Jasper. 2004. Rethinking Social Movements. Structure Meaning and Emotion. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington D.C.: Unites States Institute of Peace. Harris, Marvin. 1980. Cultural Materialism. New York: Random House. Hewitt, J. Joseph, Jonathan Wilkenfeld, and Ted Robert Gurr. 2008. Peace and Conflict 2008. Boulder, CO: Paradigm. Hewstone, Miles and Ed Cairns. 2001. “Social Psychology and Intergroup Conflict” in Daniel Chirot and Martin Seligman, Ethnopolitical Warfare. (pp.319–42) Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. Hinde, Robert. 1997. “The Psychological Bases of War.” Paper presented at Study of War Conference, Wheaton Il. Hironaka, Ann. 2005. Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States and the Perpetuation of Civil War, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Horowitz, Donald. 2001. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press. Huntington, Samuel. 1997. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone. Jean, Francois and Jean-Christophe Ruffin, eds. 1996. Economie des Guerres Civiles. Paris: Hachette Pluriel. Kaldor, Mary. 2001. New and Old Wars. Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kaplan, Robert. 1994. “The Coming Anarchy” Atlantic Monthly 273 (2), 44–76. Keeley, Lawrence. 1996. Wars Before Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. Kiernan, Ben. 1996. The Pol Pot Regime. New Haven: Yale University Press. Klandermans, Bert. 1997. The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell. Knauft, Bruce et al. 1991. “Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution” Current Anthropology 32 (4), 391–428 Kaufman, Stuart. 2001. Modern Hatreds. The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Kaufmann, Chaim. 1996. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars.” International Security 20 (4), 136–175. Laitin, David. 2007. Nations, States and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press. McAdam, Doug. 1983. “Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency.” American Sociological Review 48, 735–54. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. The Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mann, Michael. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing, New York: Cambridge University Press. Marshall, Monty and Ted Robert Gurr. 2003. Peace and Conflict 2003. College Park, MD.: University of Maryland, CIDCM. Naimark, Norman. 2001. Fires of Hatred. Ethnic Cleansing in the 20th Century, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Noel, Sid ed. 2005. From Power Sharing to Democracy. Montreal: McGill University Press. Oberschall, Anthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall. Oberschall, Anthony. 1993. Social Movements. Ideologies, Interests, and Identities. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books. Oberschall, Anthony. 1996. “Opportunities and Framing in the Eastern European Revolts of 1989” in Doug McAdam, John McCarthy and Mayer Zald, eds. Comparative Perspectives in Social Movements. (pp. 93–121). New York: Cambridge University Press. Oberschall, Anthony. 2007. Conflict and Peace Building in Divided Societies. Responses to Ethnic Violence, Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge. Olzak, Susan. 1994. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Olzak, Susan. 2006. The Global Dynamics of Racial and Ethnic Mobilization. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Ortiz de Montellano, Bernard. 1978. “Aztec Cannibalism: an Ecological Necessity?” 12 May, Science 200 (No. 4342), 611–617. Piven, Francis Fox and Richard Cloward. 1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage. Posen, Barry. 1993. “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict” in Michael Brown ed., Ethnic Conflict and International Security. (pp. 103–124) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 10. Conflict Theory 193 Quinn David and Ted Robert Gurr. 2003. “Self-Determination Movements” in Monty Marshall and Ted Robert Gurr. Peace and Conflict 2003. (pp. 26–38). College, Md.: CIDCM, University of Maryland. Rodseth, Lars et al. 1991. “The Human Community as a Primate Society.” Current Anthropolgy 32 (3), 221–242. Rude, George. 1964. The Crowd in History. New York: Wiley. Rudolph, Joseph Jr. 2003. Encyclopedia of Modern Ethnic Conflict. Westport CT: Greenwood Press Sambanis, Nicholas. 2004. “What is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational definition” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6), 814–858 Schelling, Thomas. 1963. The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press. Snyder, Jack. 2001. From Voting to Violence. Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New York: Norton. Staub, Ervin. 1989. The Roots of Evil. The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sisk, Timothy. 1996. Power Sharing and International Mediation of Conflicts, Washington D.C., United States Institute of Peace. Tajfel, H., ed. 1979. Differentiation Between Social Groups. London: Academic Press. Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movements. Social Movements and Contemporary Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tiger, Lionel and Robin Fox. 1971. The Imperial Animal. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Tilly, Charles, Louise Tilly and Richard Tilly. 1975. The Rebellious Century, 1830–1930, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tilly, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tilly, Charles. 2005. Identity, Boundaries, Social Ties. Boulder: Paradigm. Tilly, Charles and Sidney Tarrow. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder CO: Paradigm. Toft, Monica, 2002–03. “Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War” Security Studies 12 (2), 82–1193. Valentino, Benjamin. 2004. Final Solutions. Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Wallensteen, Peter. 2002. Understanding Conflict Resolution. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Walter, Barbara. 1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement” International Organization 51 (3), 335–61. Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books. Zald, Meyer and John McCarthy, eds. 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books. Zollberg, Aristide. 1966. Creating Political Order. Chicago: Rand McNally.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    GKE Task 2

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sohail, K. (2005). Prophets of violence, prophets of peace: Understanding the roots of contemporary political violence. [ebrary book]. Retrieved from https:lrps.wgu.edu/provision/17907583…

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fires Of Hatred Summary

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Naimark, Norman. Fires of Hatred: Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth-Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2001. When asked why I chose this book, I would normally respond with some answer conjured up from the depths of my lying brain. But I’ll be honest; I chose this book because it didn’t have as many pages as the others on the list of approved readings, that way I could read it faster. I would normally talk about how I am really fascinated with the topic so that’s why I chose it, but that would be lying. So I’ll stick to the truth.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lot of effort has been devoted to analyzing the protracted bloody wars of the 20th Century when mass killings were “perpetrated by and against a wide range of nations, cultures, forms of government, ethnic and religious groups” (Mingst and Snyder 2008, 368) with brazen zeal to wipe out entire races for power and control. For most disposed people of the world – the ‘bottom billion’ as Collier refers to them, unchecked power takes away the freedom of the other and replaces it with terror and the primitive fear of being controlled. It is estimated that during the 20th Century alone, between 60 million to 150 million people have died in episodes of mass killings while international and civil wars accounts for about 34 million deaths (Mingst and Snyder 2008, 368).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McEvoy, K., (2003). Beyond the metaphor: Political violence, human rights and ‘new’ peacemaking criminology. Theoretical Criminology Vol. 7(3): 319–346; 034391. Retrieved from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/11652481/beyond%20the%20metaphor.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1503859112&Signature=JU0Blfq%2FBVuJiGIHeUp%2FelZRh98%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3Dbeyond_the_metaphor.pdf…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history the world has witnessed acts of terrorism motivated by different groups of individuals fighting for a multitude of causes. These individuals have come from various races, religions, and ethnicities. Yet as different as they appear to be, we can still find similarities between them, for instance, groups such as the Tupamaros in Uruguay, the Ku Klux Klan in the United States, and the Irish Republican Army are motivated by vastly different beliefs which they consider a justification for terrorism. However, the underlying concept of these groups, by using acts of terror as a means to an end, is by and large shared by all of them. This paper will evaluate the hypothesis made by Cindy Combs which states, “The forces of oppression that have caused men to rebel have not changed over the centuries; what has changed is the willingness of the oppressed to use previously unthinkable means to achieve their objectives.”1 (Combs, p. 35.). It will also examine the strengths and weaknesses of this statement as it applies to case studies of the groups mentioned above.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, a theoretical concept, identity is used to understand various aspects of identification processes and explain their impact on social relationship and social conflict. Edward E Azar describes the violent events as Protracted Social Conflict (PSC), which means social conflicts happen when communities are deprived of the satisfaction of their basic needs on the basis of the communal identity. The deprivation is the result of a complex chain involving the role of the state and international relations. In addition, initial conditions (colonial legacy, domestic historical setting, and the multi-communal nature of the society) play important roles in shaping the genesis of protracted social conflict (Azar). According to Azar, Protected Social conflicts have three different characteristics, such as Genesis, Process Dynamics, and Outcomes Analysis. Genesis refers to a set of conditions that are responsible for the transformation of non-conflictual situations into the conflictual situation. Azar says that there are four key factors in this practice. The four preconditions are communal content, deprivation of human needs, government and the state role, and international linkages. Nepalese conflict is closely related to this theory because people have been dominated by state, and…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Military Culture

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lederach, J.P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, human beings have experienced thousands of large and small wars. We can perceive the essence of human society through those wars, power is always the blasting fuse of every kind of war. Power is like a piece of bread that attracts hungry human beings to fight for it. The film, “The Battle of Algiers”, reconstructed the distressing scene during the Algerian War of Independence. The Algerians’ militant organization, National Liberation Front, unites with the Algerians to fight against French government’s control. Ultimately, this is a battle of power between two groups. In this film analysis, I would like to use the power theory and the intergroup conflict theory to analyze the conflict in the film.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early Religious Wars

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ellingsen, T. (2005). Toward a Revival of Religion and Religious Clashes? Terrorism and Political Violence. Retrieved July 30, 2009, from EBSCOhost doi: 10.1080/09546550590929192. (University Library).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The development of the democratic peace theory started with the writings of has its roots in the writings of German Philosopher Immanuel Kant. In 1795 Kant went talked about “perpetual peace based partially upon states sharing ‘republican constitutions.’” He then said, “that a republican form of government, exemplifying the rule of law, provides a feasible basis for states to overcome structural anarchy and to secure peaceful relations among themselves.” Kant continues to argue that “once the aggressive interests of absolute monarchists are tamed and once the habit of respect for individual rights is engrained by republican governments, wars would appear as the disaster to people’s warfare,” rather than an instrument for growing a state, as it was used for many centuries. This was the true beginning of what we now know to be the Democratic Peace Theory. This theory remained dormant in the minds of realists and neo-realists that strongly influenced the field of international relations for centuries leading into the Cold War. In 1972, American sociologist Dean Babst published an article in which he reported “no wars have been fought between independent nations with elective governments between 1789 and 1941.” This enlightened the worlds of political science and international relations and ever since studies have followed this theory, constantly supporting it and positive relationships between democracies. Expanding on Kant’s original idea of democratic peace, political science professor Bruce Russett a very hot topic, exclaiming, “democracies had rarely if ever gone to war with each other” as a fact. With this simple statement, Russett made political scientists either accept or oppose the democratic peace theory and countless attempts to support each point of view with historical evidence.…

    • 3147 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Revolutions

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Successful political revolutions in the last three decades have been dominated by masses of unarmed people. They have challenged the present political establishment and refused to obey orders, often at central places in the capitals. Different from the traditional armed guerillas confronting the state army these movements have not used deadly means, not even when confronted with violent police and militaries. These cases are on crucial points different from the traditional revolutions like the French, Russian, Chinese or Cuban ones. The understanding of these movements draws on research on social movements as well as revolutionary theories and the nonviolent tradition within peace research. The role of the nonviolent means by large groups has been vital but not sufficient for the successful outcomes.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Basically, when there is not enough of sustainment to share, security is the means to ensure availability. As governments give way to local and tribal factions, “then “national security” may in the future be viewed as a local concept” (Kaplan, p93). Many times throughout recorded history where governments have not provided needed security, other factions have graciously filled the need. We can refer to our recent African example where “the radius of trust within tribal societies is narrowed to one’s immediate family and guerrilla comrades” (Kaplan, p92). The government’s inability to function as a provider of basic needs to include security simply opens the door for tribal self survival and governance. Continuing this line of thought leads us to recognize how a guerrilla style group can become a welcomed leader when security is paramount to managing scarce resources. “Instead of borders, there would be moving “centers” of power, as in the Middle Ages” (Kaplan, p93). Reviewing world events provide an instant picture of how tribal migration and radical faction control quickly assumes power in areas of overpopulation, scarce resources and government failure. Accepting the reality that devastating environmental changes, government inabilities, and increasing resource scarcity will indeed force the world’s population to seek survivability regardless of well defined country…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethnic Group Conflict

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cultural clashes, global wars, international misunderstandings, and ethnic conflicts have been occurring for decades. As early as the 1940s, constant hostility within the Middle East has resulted in suffering to human rights, education, and family structure (Huntington, Fronk & Chadwick, 2001). Culture seems to be implicated as the major contributor to conflict. The increasing modernization is strongly intertwined in this process, as it challenges traditional ideas, conservative values, and educational obstacles. How and why ethnic group conflicts occur will be illustrated in this paper by comparing and examining two ethnic groups at war. The concept of conformity and its relations to the ethnic groups will be explained as well as the kinship between social perception and social cognition. In addition, the necessary social perceptions for the resolution of the conflict will be discussed.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthony Oberschall attempts to explain the result of ethnic violence through identifying two cognitive frames; normal frame and the crisis frame. The former draws on peaceful cooperation between neighbours from all ethnic relations and emphasises on the cohesiveness of the community lacking prejudices against one another’s nationality and religion. Whereas, the latter attracts memories of historical wars, forcing the previous conflict to reflect on behaviour and treatment towards any opposing ethnicity. The crisis frame is further stimulated by sensationalism, forcing individuals to be held accountable for their nationalities and religious beliefs, and in turn, allowing innocent civilians to become targets and eventually victims of mass killings.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethnic Conflict

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The effect modernization has had on ethnic identification and ethnic conflict is not a great one. Early modernization theorists, who were quite optimistic about the positive effects of literacy, urbanization, and modern values, clearly underestimated the extent to which these factors might mobilize various ethnic groups and set them against each other (Handelman, 2011, p. 113). Modernization challenged traditional religious, national, and tribal identities by undercutting traditional ethnic practices and values. A huge part of current modernization is globalization, which pose an even greater challenge. The long-term effect of the expanding “world culture” advanced by globalization are not entirely clear (Handelman, 2011, p. 114). Globalized culture can create a backlash and increase tensions between neighboring communities as not everyone can ethically identify with each other.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics