OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Comparison Between One-Career And Two-Career Family
We have many free term papers and essays on Comparison Between One-Career And Two-Career Family. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Comparison between one-career and two-career family. A picture of a typical
American family in the 1950s could be fittingly delineated ...
... Comparison of Work-Family Conflict in Japan and the ... and they tend to stay with one
company for ... a continuous feature of the Japanese society, between groups or ...
... Citizen Hearst: A Comparison of William Randolph Hearst and Citizen ... of the newspaper
to a mere one-cent, which ... Another link can be made between the two men, as ...
Death of a salesman & M Butterfly comparison. ... an act of selfishness, benefiting no
one but himself ... names there are many undeniable similarities between both the ...
... you could have a great career, and you ... dead; she cries one tear for him and one for
herself. ... to find and extreme similarity for the comparison between the two ...
Submitted by djuanico on October 24, 2006
Category: Social Issues
Words: 635 | Pages: 3
Views: 378
Popularity Rank: 23,806
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
A picture of a typical American family in the 1950s could be fittingly delineated as a patriarchal organization with a clear division of labor. Status inequality and the division into two functional roles, wherein the male takes the income provider role and the wife takes the homemaker role, carved the power structure of the traditional one-career family. The male was elevated to a higher status—being keeper of the finances rendered even greater influence over the family.
Fundamentally, the traditional one-career family was symbiotic by design. Both partners mutually reinforce each other’s role thereby boosting the capability of each to succeed. While the women cared for the household, raised the children and handled day-to-day errands, the men were in charge of procuring employment and sourcing economic opportunities. He may occasionally assist with family affairs but his involvement was centered primarily on his career with family time as a secondary responsibility. The wife, on the other hand, may be involved with the husband’s work-related activities and financial obligations but the family remained as her ultimate priority. In such a setup, a wife through marriage consequently became economically dependent on a husband, and in turn he became emotionally dependent on her.
In contrast, modern relationships that started to emerge during the 1970s are redefining who runs the errands and how much household responsibilities are managed by each partner. The modern family arguably journeys through a period of modifying role definition because ambiguity concerning responsibility ownership and task prioritization has become apparent. No longer is it the rule for the man to assume the exclusive duty for “bringing home the proverbial bacon” (Dreyfus 1) nor the woman to engage in caring for the home and children. As a matter of fact, in some families it is the woman who plays the role as breadwinner while the man takes on the role of homemaker and...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!