OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Philosophy >> Compare And Contrast The Philosophical Contributions Aristotle And Descartes Make To Our Understanding Of A Person
We have many free term papers and essays on Compare And Contrast The Philosophical Contributions Aristotle And Descartes Make To Our Understanding Of A Person. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Compare and contrast the philosophical contributions Aristotle and Descartes
make to our understanding of a person. In order to begin ...
... contrast to that of his philosophical predecessors is ... Objects themselves in memory
In contrast to learning ... Compare Dennett (1991): These [processes] yield, over ...
... Hail Mary, full of grace ”, contrast to NIV ... The application of philosophical tools
to theology tended to ... 3. Scholars began to compare these other religions ...
... Instead, his doubting process is a philosophical one, and sometimes ... All secondary
qualities, by contrast, do not necessarily (or ... (Please compare the discussion ...
... This idea is not only popular, but is grounded in the philosophical writings of
Adam Smith (1776 ... That was a wonderful compare and contrast of individual ...
Submitted by shea66 on March 29, 2007
Category: Philosophy
Words: 1587 | Pages: 7
Views: 495
Popularity Rank: 16,272
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
In order to begin analyzing Aristotle and Descartes contribution to our notion of a person, we need to be able to understand what the term ‘personhood’ means. Unfortunately there is no clear answer, with philosophers still presenting conflicting ideas. However by asking questions such as; is ‘personhood’ identical to human being? What is the essence of a person? What relation does a person have with the world? When does personhood begin? At what point if ever does it end? And finally what makes a good person? We move closer to a set of characteristics that make up a person. Therefore we can judge Aristotle and Descartes contribution to a person by evaluating their answers to such questions.
Personhood being purely a human phenomenon is a popular debate amongst philosophers, and the side that excludes animals is taken by both Aristotle and Descartes. Being a rationalist, Descartes begins his argument for this issue with the statement that a ‘person’ is a thinking thing. He comes to this conclusion through reason in the cogito argument as he can not doubt that he thinks, and he can not exist if he ceases to think therefore he is a thinking thing. With this foundation he is able to distinguish animals from the concept of personhood, as for Descartes a thinking thing is one that doubts, understands, conceives, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, imagines, and feels, attributes needed for self- consciousness and attributes he does not believe animals to hold. While Descartes agrees that animals have mental states he does not accept that they are self- aware of themselves in relation to others and their own existence. This idea of self consciousness being a necessity in personhood, has contributed to John Locke’s theories in which he emphasises the idea of a person as a living being that is conscious of itself as persisting over time, a scholar that has greatly influenced the recently developed ‘personhood theory’. The criteria of is that a person must...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!