OPPapers.com Essay Index >> English >> Comparative Analysis-Privatizing Social Security
We have many free term papers and essays on Comparative Analysis-Privatizing Social Security. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Comparative Analysis-Privatizing Social Security. Comparative Analysis Social
Security is an important issue to our society. During ...
Submitted by on February 26, 2008
Category: English
Words: 1137 | Pages: 5
Views: 91
Popularity Rank: 99,236
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Comparative Analysis
Social Security is an important issue to our society. During campaign years, it is always a central topic for politicians and the public. Neither side can agree on whether Social Security should be privatized. I have selected two articles that represent the different viewpoints. First, there is "Creating A Better Social Security System for America," by Daniel Mitchell. The second article is "Privatizing Social Security Is Bad, Particularly for Women," by Catherine Hill. Each author explains why Social Security should or should not be privatized.
The title is the first thing a reader sees when deciding what to read. The title of Catherine Hill's article, "Privatizing Social Security Is Bad, Particularly for Women," is a great example of an eye-catching headline. It states her point-of-view clearly. It not only draws readers in by using a negative adjective "bad," but also making women curious as to how it's particularly bad for them. However, the second article, "Creating A Better Social Security System for America," is relatively plain. The author successfully gets the article's main point across in the headline, but compared to Hill's article, it's not as engaging. A better title could be, "How To Fix a Broken System." There are eye-catching words such as "broken" in it that make me want to keep reading.
A claim is the idea the writer is trying to portray in their article. In this case, each writer's claim is why or why not privatization of Social Security would be beneficial. In Mitchell's article for privatization, his claim is, "There is no way to fix the current Social Security system, but there is a way to guarantee workers a safe and secure retirement." He makes his claim more valid by stating what should be fixed and what hasn't worked in the past. His claim was made in the article's opening paragraph, therefore it made me want to keep reading and find out what ideas he had to fix the...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!