OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Social Issues >> Circumcision, Is This Practice Ethical?
We have many free term papers and essays on Circumcision, Is This Practice Ethical?. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Circumcision, is this Practice Ethical? Circumcision, is this Practice Ethical?
The debate of circumcision is a strong and ongoing one. ...
... Infibulation circumcision is the removal of the clitoris and the ... the basis of its
health risk and ethical issues ... "Female genital mutilation is practice that has ...
... Despite these facts, circumcision is still performed as a ... the current scope of nursing
practice, changing issues and concerns, and ethical concepts and ...
... for Islamic prayer.8 Today, however, female circumcision in countries ... that a Westerner
with moral or ethical objections must look at the practice with a ...
... According to some versions of ethical relativism, to say ... genital mutilation means
that the practice is right ... A is often not regarded as genuine circumcision. ...
Submitted by bdg8476 on May 18, 2008
Category: Social Issues
Words: 1550 | Pages: 7
Views: 42
Popularity Rank: 113,524
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Circumcision, is this Practice Ethical?
The debate of circumcision is a strong and ongoing one. From the beginning of medically preformed circumcisions, doctors have claimed a wide variety of benefits from this procedure. The most recent of these claims being the reduction in the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), commonly known to be the virus that causes AIDS. The rebuttal from those opposing the routine non-therapeutic circumcision of infant males is that the data collected from a few different studies is not sufficient enough to make this a necessary procedure. There is a lot of debate about informed consent among other issues. Going along with the debate of informed consent it can easily be said that doctors, by routinely performing circumcisions, are bordering on the edge of malpractice.
Medically performed circumcision came to be in approximately 1865 in England and 1870 in the United States (CIRP, 2005). This procedure was believed to cure the disease of masturbation and was routinely performed without chloroform with the intention of associating the pain of circumcision with the act of masturbating (Hodges & Warner, 1995). In their article, Hodges & Warner went on to say “By the turn of the century, circumcision had become a panacea. Amputation of the foreskin was "scientifically proven" to cure and prevent diseases ranging from insanity to epilepsy, malnutrition, hip-joint disease, paralysis, eczema, tuberculosis, headache, hysteria, alcoholism, criminality, and heart disease.” (1995) The United States military holds a large portion of the responsibility for circumcision becoming so common place. In both WWI and WWII, soldiers were required to allow military doctors to perform circumcision with a court-martial being the penalty for not conforming. They were told that it was more hygienic and it prevented disease. When these soldiers returned home after the war, not knowing any better, they continued the practice on...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!