OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Miscellaneous >> Case: Toyota, Ford, Gm And Volkswagen- Some Differing Opinions About Working With Suppliers
We have many free term papers and essays on Case: Toyota, Ford, Gm And Volkswagen- Some Differing Opinions About Working With Suppliers. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
CASE: TOYOTA, FORD, GM AND VOLKSWAGEN- SOME DIFFERING OPINIONS ABOUT WORKING WITH SUPPLIERS CASE: TOYOTA, FORD, GM AND VOLKSWAGEN- SOME DIFFERING OPINIONS ABOUT
Case: Toyota, Ford, GM, And Volkswagen - Some Differing Opinions 1. GM and Ford have quickly pushed the development of large Internet sites to create an environment
Ford, and Toyota were chosen because they are the current market leaders. DaimlerChrysler, Nissan, Volkswagen, and Honda were chosen because of their status as stable
operations can be seen in the automobile industry. The major competitors (Diamler Chysler, Ford, GM, Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Volkswagen) all compete in the major
Motors, and Toyota have been below the industry average since 2004. The 5-year average current ratio for Ford, GM, and Toyota is 0.58, 1.2, and 0.68, respectively.
Submitted by mwiley4 on February 12, 2008
Category: Miscellaneous
Words: 1199 | Pages: 5
Views: 625
Popularity Rank: 17,246
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
CASE: TOYOTA, FORD, GM AND VOLKSWAGEN- SOME DIFFERING OPINIONS ABOUT WORKING WITH SUPPLIERS. CASE SUMMARY: The main issues at stake in this case is the working relationship Toyota has with its suppliers, compared to other Auto manufacturers such as ford and General Motors. Another critical issue is which sets of parts should be standardized. Both Ford and GM have embraced the concept of an electronic market place for motor vehicle parts. The AutoX-change as it is called would bring automakers and their suppliers together. The rational for this e-market place is that it would drastically reduce costs by providing suppliers with more business opportunities. Toyota on the other hand tends to see its suppliers as partners. By engaging suppliers in long-term contracts, it is hoped that they would reduce prices. Toyota's fear is that engaging in the AutoX-change would create and adversarial relationship with themselves and suppliers. The sub-plot to this case is the standardization of auto parts sold in Europe. Toyota has been experiencing lagging sales in Europe. Once again, Toyota is at difference with VW and Ford. The main point of contention as it related to standardization resulted from the definition of "competitive components". Toyota had a much wider range of parts in this category than GM and VW. SWOT ANALYSIS. STRENGTH This market place will provide manufactures with more components to choose from. The online marketplace could help reducing costs to the manufacturer. It also has the potential to provide suppliers with more business, considering that they would be able to view the needs of the manufacturers online. Another strength of the proposed e-procurement site is the financial strength and backing it would have considering that it is being spearheaded by the likes of GM and Ford. This would create a "click- and-mortar" type company. WEAKNESS The main weakness of such a system is that companies like Toyota would no longer be able to treat suppliers as...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!