Free Term Papers on Business Law Problems

OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> Business Law Problems

We have many free term papers and essays on Business Law Problems. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.

Essays from FratFiles.com
  1. Business Law Problems

    Business Law problems. 1. What are the four elements of a valid contract?
    A contract is an “agreement between parties, with terms ...

  2. Business Law Common Problems

    Business Law common problems. Business Law Midterm paper Problem 1: 1.
    The Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act applies in cases where ...

  3. Role And Function Of Law

    ... This power is considerable in relation to business. ... to deal with these social and
    economic problems. ... agencies make two types of law administrative regulations ...

  4. A Company Is The Property Of The Shareholders Is An Exploded Myth

    ... of staff • It helps to corrects social problems caused by ... Corporations, Crime and
    Accountability, Revised Edition • CIMA Business Law, 1990 • Donnelly ...

  5. Monopolistic Practices On Electricity Business In Java

    ... to coup with the lower frequency problems, the number ... enterprise the authority holder
    of electric business in Indonesia in pursuance of the law No.15 ...

View More Papers...

Business Law Problems

Submitted by M_Bubbies on October 14, 2007

Category: Business
Words: 2551 | Pages: 11
Views: 331
Popularity Rank: 28,422
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)

1. What are the four elements of a valid contract?
A contract is an "agreement between parties, with terms and conditions that describe the agreement that constitutes a legal obligation" (All Business). A valid contract requires four elements and these are:
a. Mutual agreement – there must be a meeting of the minds between parties. There should be an offer and an acceptance. There should be an agreement to enter into the contract
b. Consideration - meaning that "every party is conferring a benefit on the other party or himself sustaining a recognizable detriment, such as a reduction of the party's alternative courses of action where the party would otherwise be free to act with respect to the subject matter without any limitation" (Wikipedia). This simply means that there should be something given and something received.
c. Legality - The good or service being exchanged must be legal
d. Capacity – both parties should be legally competent to enter into the agreement.
2. Describe the objective theory of contracts. How does that theory apply to this case?
In layman's term, the objective theory of contracts simply means that "we look at whether a reasonable person to whom the statement was address would believe it to be an offer" (Lloyd). In the case of PepsiCo's advertisement and Leonard suit, it is obvious that there is no contract on the basis of the objective theory. As the judge ruled "an objective reasonable person would not have considered the commercial an offer" (John D.R. Leonard vs. PepsiCo). The commercial was supposed to be humorous and an objective person would look at it that way and not really an offer just like Leonard assumed it was.
3. Why do you think the court held that there was not a valid agreement here?
The court held that that there is no valid agreement here because the commercial was evidently was made in jest. Also if we look at one of the four elements of a valid...

You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!