OPPapers.com Essay Index >> American History >> Bill Of Rights To Protect From Tyranny
We have many free term papers and essays on Bill Of Rights To Protect From Tyranny. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
BIll of Rights to protect from tyranny. After the Constitution was written,
the new born nation was immediately split into two political ...
... they felt that a government should have just enough power to protect everyone’s ... reason
America does not have a tyranny is because of the Bill of Rights. ...
... The purpose of The Bill of Rights is to protect citizens from abuse of power that
may be committed by the different areas of their government. ...
... Under this system, the rights listed in the Bill of Rights and the ... citizenry still
recognized the democratic needs of the government to protect the common ...
... A constitutional bill of rights was a longtime dream for ... is silent about economic
and social rights, the Quebec ... or state in the world to protect people from ...
Submitted by whyareyousougiy on November 11, 2007
Category: American History
Words: 768 | Pages: 4
Views: 165
Popularity Rank: 73,341
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
After the Constitution was written, the new born nation was immediately split into two political sides, the federalists and the anti-federalists, over the ratification. Federalists, southern planters or people that tended to hold interest in trade, advocated a strong executive. On the other hand, anti-federalists, back country people or people involved in business but not in the mercantile economy, opposed the ratification of the constitution. The two sides, after much debate, were able to come to a compromise after the Bill of Rights was included into the Constitution.
When the new Constitution was drafted, the ratification, the official approval by the people of the United States, sparked a national debate. People were shocked by the radical changes it proposed; they expected the convention to merely amend the Articles of Confederation. They were afraid of regressing back into a state under tyranny, a form of rule where a single or small group reigns with vast or absolute power. Americans had just fought for their freedom from the tyrannical rule of the king of England. All their efforts and revolutionary ideas would have gone to waste.
Supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists, a name referring to a balance of power between the states and the national government. They argued for a federal system as in the Constitution. James Madison claimed that the Constitution was less dangerous that it looked because the separation of powers protected people from tyrannical abuse. The Federalists compile a group of essays, known as The Federalist Papers. In No. 51, Madison insisted that the division of powers and they system of checks an balances would protect Americans from the tyranny of centralized authority. He wrote that opposite motives among government office holders were good, and was one of the advantages of a big government with different demographics. In No. 10, he said that there was no need to fear factions, for not...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!