OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Miscellaneous >> Bethel School District Vs. Fraser
We have many free term papers and essays on Bethel School District Vs. Fraser. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Bethel School District Vs. Fraser. Bethel School District vs. Fraser This
case involved a public high school student, Matthew Fraser ...
Bethel School District vs. Fraser. On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser, a student
at Bethel High School in Bethel, Washington, delivered ...
... References Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 US 675 (1986).
Dowling-Sendor, B. (July, 2001). A question of rights vs. authority. ...
... the Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) vs. ... In the case Bethel
School District No ... 403 v. Fraser (1986), a high school student used profane ...
... In 1937, the Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board NLRB vs. ... In the case
Bethel School District No 403 v. Fraser 1986, a high school student ...
Submitted by Natalie1890 on April 18, 2001
Category: Miscellaneous
Words: 728 | Pages: 3
Views: 1516
Popularity Rank: 2,222
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Bethel School District vs. Fraser
This case involved a public high school student, Matthew Fraser who gave a speech nominating another student for a student elective office. The speech was given at an assembly during school as a part of a school-sponsored educational program in self-government. While giving the speech, Fraser referred to his candidate in what the school board called \"elaborate, graphic, and explicit metaphor.\" After his speech, the assistant principal told Fraser that the school considered the speech a violation of the school\'s \"disruptive-conduct rule.\" This prohibited conduct that interfered with the educational process, including obscene, profane language or gestures. After Fraser admitted he intentionally had used sexual innuendo in the speech, he was told that he would be suspended from school for three days, and his name would be removed from the list of the speakers at the graduation exercises.
Fraser\'s father brought action against the school board in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. He alleged the suspension and punishment were a violation of his son\'s First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The father sought injunctive and monetary damages under 42 U.S.C. of 1983. The district court awarded the student $278 in damages, $12,750 in litigation costs and attorney\'s fees, and ordered the school district not to prevent the student from speaking at the commencement ceremonies.
The school district appealed the decision, arguing that the speech had a disruptive effect on the educational process. The school district said it had an interest in protecting an audience of minors from indecent speech in the school. The school board believed it had the right to control language that was used during a school-sponsored activity. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court.
The district court found...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!