OPPapers.com Essay Index >> American History >> The Balancing Act Between The Individual Interest And The Common Good
We have many free term papers and essays on The Balancing Act Between The Individual Interest And The Common Good. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
The Balancing Act between the Individual Interest and the Common Good.
The proper relationship between the individual’s interests ...
... Individual investors, pension funds, mutual funds, insurance agencies ... and is a delicate
balancing act all banks ... the United States: Spread between the discount ...
... employee must be tailored to the individual employee ... Managing money motivation is
a balancing act between the need ... if there is any connection between that need ...
... causes them happiness when they act morally ... its moral condemnation suggesting an
interplay between such activity ... A critical factor in balancing the happiness of ...
... Organizing your finances to distinguish between savings and ... Companies have a balancing
act to maintain to stay ... Any individual that has a goal to prosper in the ...
Submitted by jchrhee on June 3, 2007
Category: American History
Words: 1612 | Pages: 7
Views: 195
Popularity Rank: 54,367
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
The proper relationship between the individual's interests and the common good is a delicate balancing act that political philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Sophocles have tried to define. For philosophers such as Socrates and Plato, the common good trumps the individual interest when those interests interfere with what they believe is right for society as a whole. For others like Aristotle and Locke, a consensus on what the common good is must be defined within the reality that individual interests exists; meaning, they cannot be completely discarded for the good of society. I believe that in a free society, where the common good to doesn't have to be forced upon its citizens, the common good should impose upon the individual's interest only as much as citizens will allow without feeling such impositions are unreasonable restrictions on their lives.
The reason that unreasonable restrictions on the individual's interests cannot be entirely ignored is that human nature doesn't allow for such selflessness. Since that is so, citizens will not allow for common good to exist in a society if it as the expense of their interests. However, small restrictions can be readily accepted it they believe that such impositions actually affords them the safety and opportunity to nurture their interests. For example, the property owner will gladly pay taxes to the government for the common good if they believe that the government will protect them those who would steal their land. In Aristotle's critic of Plato, Aristotle points out that humans cannot learn what the common good and what their proper role in society is without having individual interests. For example, Aristotle pokes holes in Plato's position that philosophers should not possess personal property as irrational as it does not take into consideration that property ownership "contributes to the overall rational structure of society and thus to people's happiness," which is a...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!