This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
Human Cloning
This article was about human cloning. For this article to be a strong argument it has to prove its point and have lots of details. The title of this article is “Human Cloning. The topic of my article is cloning. This article is trying to prove that cloning is the right thing to do. In my opinion this article is strong because it contains a lot of facts and details. This article is trying to prove that human cloning is right. “I argue for cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants”. “There are no problems with identical twins so why should there be a problem with clones”. As a result, human cloning may have advantages but no disadvantages. I believe the argument is strong. The one quote that made me side with this article was “I argue for human cloning as some people are awaiting organ transplants. The argument in this article is that cloning is a good thing. I believe this article because it has more facts and details than opinions. The author of this article persuades me to believe the article is true. The author of this article gives lots of facts and details to make me believe it’s true. In closing, it’s easy to say that this article is strong.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Kass mentions his four different objections of why cloning should not be performed and the reason they should completely stop researching and experimenting. On the first premises he mentions that it’s an unethical experimentation on the unborn. His reason behind this statement is that it is unethical and too risky to perform such experiment on the unborn child. Mr. Kass mentions that less than 2-3% of cloning attempts succeeded. Moreover, many of the cloned animals that did survive were born with deformities like cows with heart and lung problems and animals not reaching their normal developmental milestone. It is without much doubt that cloning humans would begin on a trial in error. A scientist discovered that a nucleus of an unaltered egg is formed and arranged through months or years as in an altered egg it must reprogram within minutes or hours. Thus, this is why there is a high chance of developmental defects. Mr. Leon E. Kass doesn’t believe in this type of research and believes strictly that cloning should not be permitted because of its unethical experimentation to the unborn child. His second premises, he makes it clear that it threatens identity and Individuality. The reasons behind this statement are that clones, as he mentions, would experience concerns about their own self and appearance; being identical to another person whose genotype is the same. Moreover, He mentions about issues with mixing parents with twin relation and the issues of having too…
- 1985 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The Evaluation of five Websites about Cloning based on their Credibility and support by peer-reviewed Articles…
- 1944 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
The last paragraph is good because it acknowledges that more research has occurred since the article was written. I think you need to be more specific about what has happened. Also, I don't think you really do anything to refute the points made by people who are against cloning. Instead you just agree with the author Postrel. Maybe you could write about new developments that prove that those "pundits" are…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…
- 1358 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The general consensus of human cloning is generally faced with disgust. The public opinion of cloning is generally unpopular and is not faced favorably. Because of the unpopular opinion of cloning, there is not much pressure from opposition to allow cloning. It is believed that once science evolved to the point where scientists could successfully engineer an offspring that was perfect and designed by a “parent”, the public opinion of cloning might change. With the public opinion of cloning changed, it may spell certain disaster for the human race. Kass believes this is a possibility because of the mindset of society today. With the instant gratification attitude of society, people are more apt to custom design a child rather that conceiving a child “the old fashioned way”. Kass sees that this…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…
- 3138 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The main topic can be a topic of controversy; before and after reading the passage, my stance on human cloning stays the same. I still believe that it is not right and not necessary, and that people should focus on more relevant issues in todays world. Cloning wont feed the poor, get people jobs, help the economy, or cure AIDS. People should learn what to focus on and invest more time and money in issues with potential benefits to society, not something like cloning. Lewis Thomas seems to take a similar stance in his work.…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Reproductive cloning on the other hand won’t be good as well. In the article's reproductive cloning arguments pro and con it is mentioned that “Reproductive cloning would diminish the uniqueness of an individual.” Reproducing a child is the most beautiful moment you can experience. Mostly because your partner (that you love) and you have created a human being that won’t look similar to any other person. Cloning yourself to have a “child” will ruin the perspective of bearing or raising an actual kid. Having a clone as your “child” wouldn’t be a great idea. Hhaving a kid is a major difference than having a kid that looks exactly like you in every way. Those who can’t bear children because of multiple reasons have the opportunity to adopt a child. Why want more when you can get a kid without going through so much…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“ It lays the technical groundwork for cloning-to-produce-children, which raises a host of ethical concerns. It could lead to fetal farming--growing cloned embryos to a later stage so that their valuable organs can be harvested for research or transplantation.” (Stark) This quote shows that clones can be created for their organs which could also help people. “Boisselier said the public needs to know "there is a huge demand" for cloning technology from couples unable to have children.” (Spar) This quote shows that people can use clones as their children if they are unable to have children. As you can see, The evidence shows that cloning would be a big help for…
- 638 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of many hot topics that we have to faced it. The hot topic and the main subject that I am talking about right now is cloning. People are questioned is cloning ethical. As a scientist, it is normally if they want to cloning human, animal, and more living things as part of their job to experiment new stuff that we discovered in this planet. This writer is a sophomore at a high school and doing their research about cloning. This writer strongly disagree with cloning, it is unethical and it should be illegal by any…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Starting with an explanation of what cloning is and the two main types of the technology: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning, this paper goes on to explore the ramifications these technologies may have in different areas of our society with respect to government, funding issues for research, religious views, education for our children on cloning issues and lastly the publics response to cloned animal produce.…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
The final argument against the banning of cloning is that it allows individuals or couples to reproduces through means other than sexual reproduction. Infertile couples could benefit from human cloning in that the couple could create a genetic duplicate of one of the parents. Further research even…
- 604 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays