OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Miscellaneous >> Argue A Case Against Animals As Specimens For Scientific Experimentation
We have many free term papers and essays on Argue A Case Against Animals As Specimens For Scientific Experimentation. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Argue a Case Against Animals As Specimens for Scientific Experimentation Ethics can be described as an internal control on the decisions made by an individual. It
anthropocentric ethical views. Species, Rolston went on to argue, are intrinsically valuable and are usually more valuable than individual specimens, since the loss
defensible. In any case, once the allowance is made for an all-powerful creator, it is a small matter to allow for him to have acted supernaturally upon the earth,
species found on the nearby continent, while inhabitants of similar neighboring islands in the Galapagos had quite different animal populations. In London, Darwin
Submitted by marval18 on January 31, 2006
Category: Miscellaneous
Words: 851 | Pages: 4
Views: 233
Popularity Rank: 59,915
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Ethics can be described as an internal control on the decisions made by an individual. It refers to the moral values and principles that guide one's behavior with respect to what might be considered right or wrong. Ethical standards are not set by law but merely guided by it and the accepted social standards that exist in a particular community or society. It is a simplistic opinion that choices are governed either by law or free choice and such a view can lead to the belief that something is ethical once it is not illegal. Animal testing is not controlled or dictated law. Therefore is it ethical? It is of my belief that a truly ethical person is one who aids all life he is capable of helping. Although it is impossible to put an end to all suffering why not stop what is possible.
Animals such as mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, pigs, horses and monkeys are used for research and testing. It is not required by law for research institutions to keep records and so the exact number of animals used in scientific experimentation has not yet been determined. However, approximately seventy million animals are blinded, maimed, scalded, genetically manipulated, force-fed chemicals or otherwise hurt or killed on an annual basis in the United States. Of this number, eighteen million warm blooded vertebrae are killed in experiments in comparison to England, in which two and a half million are killed, less than two million in Canada and approximately three quarters of a million in the Netherlands.
According to the Home Office Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, Great Britain, 2001, the total number of procedures on animals has increased by four percent. In addition to this, procedures resulting in a genetic defect total 259, 898, a rise of five percent. It is important to note that the use of animals in tobacco research has declined one hundred per cent and tests for cancer-causing chemicals decreased by one hundred and nine percent. There are...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!