OPPapers.com

Animal Testing

The Use of animals for Laboratory Testing

There has been an on going debate on whether to use animals for laboratory

testing. There are people now saying the use of animals in laboratory testing is not

necessary and there are other alternatives. Many of these people claim the tests that are

performed on the animals are not particularly valid. On the other hand, others claim that

laboratory testing has been depended on animals to achieve medical advances. Whether

or not the use of animals in laboratory test is a matter of opinion. It will take the

necessary investigation and consideration to figure out what needs to be done. Taking a

closer look at each issue will help to show the use of laboratory testing should not be

used. There are three issues that show the use of animals in laboratory testing should not

be used: cruel, unnecessary, and there are other alternatives.

The most obvious issue not to use animals in laboratory testing is it's cruel to

animals. Animals used in the labatories are used for testing drugs, vaccines, and

consumer products. Million of innocent animals die each year to determine the safety of

products for humans. "To my mind life of the lamb is no less precious that that of a

human being. I should be unwilling to take the life of the lamb for the sake of the human

body. I hold that, the more helpless a creature, the more entitled it is to protection by man

from the cruelty of man" (Vincent 13). There are 2.5 million animals used in laboratory

testing each year in this country (Chea). The side effects of these tests are disturbing. The

side effects of the eye test are redness, swelling, ulceration, bleeding, and blindness.

Acute toxicity test effects are even worse. They include convulsions, labored breathing,

Brigman...