Preview

American Democracy: a Real Democracy or Hidden Oligarchy?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
American Democracy: a Real Democracy or Hidden Oligarchy?
American Democracy:
A Real Democracy or Hidden Oligarchy?

The United States was founded with the intent that class distinction and rigid social structure were the things left behind in the old world. Life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness were the basis that created the American dream from the very beginning. The state where people face promise of political democracy, wide range of civil liberties, opportunity for economic prosperity, and equality between each and every citizen. “Government of the people, by the people, and for the people” was the belief that led the Founding fathers away from oligarchy and self-managing systems.
But today, the politically powerful and wealthy dominate our society, economy, and government. The powerful minority or the social class has never been more distinct and disturbing in the American society than it is now. The nation is divided not only by partisan politics, culture, race, religion, and age, it is divided by what we do or what we have – or do not have. Political, business, and academic elites have embraced the vision of the world that supersedes our mere nation with the only goal of making money and power, erasing the middle class, and crating a proletariat deprived of economic opportunity, fair wages, and voice in Washington D.C. But is that a true state of democracy that United States of America has built on or it’s just a façade that induces passive acceptance of the elite rule? The media, education system, campaign industry, and government leaders constantly shape the American politics changing it to a form, far more different than the democratic theory, a form also known as oligarchy.

"Rule by the people"
Democracy is a complicated concept. It is not just a structure of government, or electoral politics, democracy is “politics with purpose” (Oakes, pg. 491). The people should have input on how their government is run and their rights of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” should be protected by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit #3 Review

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The US Constitution is one of the most influential documents in the history of modern governance. The system of government established by the writers of this document not only reflected and helped to ensure the hopes and desires of many citizens of the newly independent American state, but, perhaps more importantly, this system has served as a dramatic symbol for those people throughout the world who have struggled against tyranny and oppression ever since. This document has also served as a model for the creation of new governments over the past two hundred years. Nevertheless, some scholars, including Howard Zinn and Charles Beard, who wrote An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, contend that this document is not the democratic mantra that its supporters proclaim it to be. These critics argue that the Constitution was designed primarily to protect the economic interests of the aristocracy, not only from the tyranny of the government, but also from the political pressures of the lower classes. They point to the ideas of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances as being primarily ways in which the elites of American society could insulate themselves from the will of the common people rather than efforts to protect against tyrannical government. These scholars also look to the writings of James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers to support their contentions. Finally, they look to the actions of some of the founding fathers, like Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and even Jefferson to find support for this theory. During this unit, we will examine this evidence in order to assess the validity of this theory as compared to the more traditional views of most Americans. As always, finding the truth requires a delicate balance of inquisitiveness, interpretation, speculation, and appreciation for subtlety. There are seldom…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ferguson term paper

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Democracy is a means for the people to choose their leaders and to hold their leaders accountable for their policies and their conduct in office. The people decide who will represent them in…

    • 1152 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Growing up as kids we were taught the design of our democracy and the constitutional principles. According to the Webster Dictionary a democracy is “ government in which people choose their leaders by voting, and where they are treated equally and have equal rights.” The definition does not capture what the United States feels it's a democracy. The United States is believe in the democratic ideology is, but is best known as a representative republic. In The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001: "Traditionally a republic is distinguished from a true democracy in that the republic operates through a representative assembly chosen by the citizenry, while in a democracy the populace participates directly in governmental affairs. In actual practice,…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ii. Political equality – the principle that says that each person carries equal weight in the conduct of the public business and also involves 14th amendment which means equal protection which mean all are treated equally. Together they are known as civil rights which are guarantees by government of equal citizenship to all social groups…

    • 3416 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Democracy is a difficult concept to define, but as a simplification and a conventional definition, it is the people's right to choose and the right to say how the country is run. Democracy falls into many categories and comes in various different forms. One form is when power is in the hands of the population as a whole and political decisions are made themselves, this is known as direct democracy. An example of a direct democracy currently present in the UK is a referendum. Another form is representative democracy; in this case citizens will vote for representatives to create decisions for them and the responsibility is handed over to the representative to make decisions for the country. The representatives are also accountable to the electorate.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present political spectrum, democracy is essentially understood as both the most humane and effective means by which to govern a body politic. While democracy is currently relatively non-controversial, this was not the case during its establishment. The democratic experiment in America was viewed somewhat indifferently by many of the world's prominent political philosophers. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill existed among those most apprehensive of the democratic experiment. To each of these men, democracy certainly possessed certain positive attributes, but at the same time, represented a potential threat to the individual freedoms of man, through a much feared 'tyranny of the majority'.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three contemporary theories of American democracy are the pluralist theory, elite and class theory and hyperpluralism. The pluralist theory is a theory of government and politics emphasizing that politics is mainly a competition among groups, each one pressing for its own preferred policies. Pluralist theory describes a society ruled by the opinions of many views which inevitably results in conflicting views. This conflict tends to cancel out any gains made by one side, resulting in a kind of natural equilibrium. An example of pluralist is the inability of the House and the Senate to swiftly come to actions because of Democratic/Republican conflict. The elite and class theory is a theory of government and politics contending that societies are divided along class lines and that an upper-class elite will rule, regardless of the formal niceties of governmental organization. Over a third of the nation's wealth is currently held by just one percent of the American Population. Elite and Class theorists believe that this one percent of Americans controls most policy decisions because they can afford to finance election campaigns and control key institution, such as large corporations. They tend to live in the Northeast and attend exclusive prep schools and Ivy League universities. They tend to belong to mainline Protestant churches and they marry one another. Often members of the elite do not occupy governmental positions themselves, but depend on elected and appointed officials who do their work for them. Hyperplurism is a theory of government and politics contending that groups are so strong that government is weakened. There are several different groups, such as religions, cultural groups, ethnicities or interest groups that the government can't control due to hyperplurism. It is an extreme form of pluralism. An example would have to be the stance on abortion or gay marriage, pertaining to the state's constitution. Some states are passing laws either allowing gay…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political parties exist in a democracy as a way for likeminded individuals to be united over a set of shared beliefs. (Daniel) Political parties allow the members of the party to elect politicians to government positions in order to advance their beliefs. (Hargrave) The political parties offer their members strength in numbers, by uniting large numbers of individuals into a collective group; they can select the best candidates to pursue their interests, as opposed to having thousands of individuals running for office based on a very narrow spectrum of beliefs. (Daniel) While political parties help organize the election process and enable individuals to influence government activity by uniting in strong collectives, they can also cause great harm to the ideals of a democratic government. The founding fathers of the United States were in fact opposed to the idea of the formation of political parties. (Phillips) George Washington warned the American people of the potential dangers of having political parties. Washington felt that the parties would over time become too powerful and take the power away from the people and use it for their own interests. (George Washington Quotes) In many ways Washington’s prediction has proven to be accurate. The existence of political parties in combination with other characteristics of the United States government demonstrates how political parties can have adverse effects on democracy.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plutocracy In America

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Americans are conditioned to see our present form of government as a representative democracy where power is in the hands of all the people. Until this assignment I realize did not understand plutocracy or the fact that we may already be living in a plutocracy. A plutocracy is defined as "government by the wealthy." A political system where power is concentrated in the hands of a small number of wealthy people, usually those with inherited wealth and wealthy families. At the top of every society an ironic mixture of those who are there by merit and capability and those who merely grab, hoard, and wield power and wealth. Every nation has its many, the general populace, and its few, the elite who dominate, rule, and favor themselves with wealth and privilege. It is and always has been the way of the world. It is not difficult to understand why this is so, why every society and nation forms itself into the many and the dominant few.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think democracy is endangered by the need to raise huge amounts of money to run for public office? Is the need for big money leading to less democracy—that is, government by special interests? Would you support public financing of campaigns?…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is America A Democracy?

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Much confusion has been made over the statement that we are a democracy. To make this clear, America has never been a democracy. Special interest groups would argue that this is just not true. One of the leading professors in the country on the subject of democracy, Professor Martin…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution has endured as a covenant between the government and the people of the union for hundreds of years, evolving with the changes from culture to industry. As a result, the true origins have become misconstrued to the people. Common citizens allot credit to the great John Locke for philosophies regarding the earliest influences of the colonial ideals of government; however no sole contributor created the fire that started for American liberty and relationship to a new government (11). Another misconception lies within the idea that American democracy exercised and established in the Constitution lives as a derivation from Greek and Roman ideals, yet many European philosophers and politicians such as Montesquieu provoked…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States is a nation established in 1776 on a set of principles: liberty, equality, and self-government. These ideals derived in part from broad lessons of history, from the colonist, and treatises such as those of Locke and Rousseau. Liberty is a principle that individuals should be free to act and think as they choose, as long as their actions don’t infringe on the rights and freedoms of others. Equality is a notion that all individuals are equal and entitled to equal treatment under the law. Self-government is the principle that the people are the ultimate source and proper beneficiary of governing authority. These principles were the foundation for the United States set forth and written by our founding fathers, but taken from rulers and minds of Europeans during the Enlightenment period.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Changes in the congress are vindicated by the political investments of the democrats and the republicans (Williamson, 1925). Whilst the political success is not supposed to determine the significance of the policies to be implemented, it is clearly evident that in United States that the power house in the congress is oriented at propelling towards establishing those policies that indicate or rather display superiority politically. This results to retrogression in the country instead of gradual positive change with time (Mann, Ornstein and Annenberg, 2006). This is a present and notable experience in the United States congress that clearly illustrates that American democracy is broken. Adequate public awareness has not been made to the citizens of the United States thereby leaving the nations susceptible to manipulations by the activists rather being independent and driven by their own opinions. This has led to voting being done to people that are not the best candidates yet still made to be the presidents and states representatives in United States. Senators are bale to conduct and hold businesses at their own will for a long period of time as much as they wish in ordered to gain from their positions given the power they are accorded. The American democracy is not only broken but also not helping the nation in moving…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the United States’s reputation as the government of the people, for the people, and by the people, exactly how strong is our country’s government? When I conducted my ten interviews, the majority, eight students, stated the importance of democracy, however, none were sure of its security. Despite the several distinct patterns and similarities in many of the interviewees’ answers, not a single student answered identically to another. One student completely disregarded democracy while another believed democracy is the best form of government, regardless of how well it works in the United States. The data I gathered may not reflect the thoughts of all or even most of the youths in this country, but there does seem to be a general consensus…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics