OPPapers.com Essay Index >> Business >> Alumnia, Inc
We have many free term papers and essays on Alumnia, Inc. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine.
Alumnia, Inc. Introduction Alumina, Inc. (AI), as portrayed in the University
of Phoenix (UOP) simulation, is a $4 billion dollar ...
... the Erhwon Reporter newspaper. A 38 year old mother, Kelly Bates, has accused
Alumnia Inc. of repeatedly contaminating the waters ...
Submitted by Andrew1 on February 29, 2008
Category: Business
Words: 1729 | Pages: 7
Views: 412
Popularity Rank: 21,279
Average Member Grade: N/A (Add a Comment / Grade this Paper)
Introduction
Alumina, Inc. (AI), as portrayed in the University of Phoenix (UOP) simulation, is a $4 billion dollar company operating n eight countries around the world. AI’s business interests are in automotive components and manufacture of packaging materials, bauxite mining, alumna refining, and aluminum smelting (UOP, 2007). Five years prior, AI was reported to be in violation of environmental discharge norms discovered during a routine compliance evaluation inspection. AI was ordered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to clean up to which they promptly complied. AI claims strict compliance with all standards and regulations. Kelly Bates has now accused AI of poor environmental practices. She further claims that those poor actions could have been the proximate cause of leukemia her 10-year old daughter to developed. AI disputes that claim and defends their environmental record. An examination of the key facts, regulations and legal issues governing this issue follows.
Key Facts, Regulations and Legal Issues
Fact 1: The Erehwon Reporter report[ed] that Kelly Bates accused AI of repeatedly contaminating the waters of Lake Dira with carcinogenic effluents, and has alleged that consumption of the contaminated water is the proximate cause of her 10-year old daughter’s leukemia (UOP simulation, 2007). The impact of such an accusation could damage the company’s “good name” and public image and adversely affect business by swaying public opinion. AI, convinced the emission rates were way below the prescribed level because of the use of the best available technology for pollutant cleanup, decided to release a news story highlighting the efficacy of the systems and the clean record. AI complied with the Clean Water Act. Subsequently, AI conducted an independent study which affirmed the fact that the PAH levels were lower than the prescribed 5 milligrams per liter for all hydrocarbons. Armed with that information, AI was...
You must Login to view the entire paper.
If you are not a member yet, Sign Up for free!