A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary
Non-humans has been there longer than humans in the history. Humans have taken for granted of the non humans because we humans are the most dominated in the food web. Also humans don’t realize how much pain we could cause to non humans. Both article “A Change of Heart about Animal” by Jeremy Rifkin and “Hooked on a myth” by Victoria Braithwaite states that humans don’t really care for animals and want change to treat animals fairly. However, humans do not feel any type of emotions, take for granted and treated them unright; therefore Bill of Rights for the for the U.S should be created for animals because they could be happy, safe and treat them right.
Indeed, Raising the issues of animal welfare is impossible to develop clear guidelines to judge by. On the article “Hooked on a Myth” states “we should adopt a precautionary ethical approach and assume that in the absence of evidence to the contrary fish suffer.” However the principle is no different between men and animal. Working out animal freedom in an actual practice that gain the concerns and role of ethics. Animals should be treated with compassion and grateful. A right …show more content…
He states that animals have a sense of empathy, and awareness. Rifkin states that “Animals, as it appears, experience grief. Elephants will often stand by their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks.” Jeremy Rifkin is insisting that the elephants sorrow for their dead family members, showing that they are certainly aware. I truly agree that animals are sentient human like, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe that animals have no sense of their morality and are not capable of cognizance because they lack a sense of individuality. Animals deserve to be protected, under law, when their feelings and emotions are so very similar to those of
Indeed, Raising the issues of animal welfare is impossible to develop clear guidelines to judge by. On the article “Hooked on a Myth” states “we should adopt a precautionary ethical approach and assume that in the absence of evidence to the contrary fish suffer.” However the principle is no different between men and animal. Working out animal freedom in an actual practice that gain the concerns and role of ethics. Animals should be treated with compassion and grateful. A right …show more content…
He states that animals have a sense of empathy, and awareness. Rifkin states that “Animals, as it appears, experience grief. Elephants will often stand by their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks.” Jeremy Rifkin is insisting that the elephants sorrow for their dead family members, showing that they are certainly aware. I truly agree that animals are sentient human like, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe that animals have no sense of their morality and are not capable of cognizance because they lack a sense of individuality. Animals deserve to be protected, under law, when their feelings and emotions are so very similar to those of